Loading club…
Club strength in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
Average standard score over all five disciplines, among the clubs with a strength in all five that week: 0 is an average club, +1 one standard deviation above it. Gaps are weeks the club wasn't strong enough to be listed in every discipline.
| Season | Men's singles | Women's singles | Men's doubles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles | Combined |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 1578 | 778 | 1495 | 967 | 1242 | −1.28 |
| 2015/2016 | 1593 | 991 | 1532 | 1102 | 1221 | −0.99 |
| 2016/2017 | 1614 | 975 | 1525 | 1032 | 1216 | −0.98 |
| 2017/2018 | 1532 | 1038 | 1401 | 1106 | 1261 | −1.26 |
| 2018/2019 | 1302 | 1059 | 1309 | 1044 | 1264 | −1.35 |
| 2019/2020 | 1292 |
The club's strength at the end of each week: a weighted average of the club's best 4 players (40% · 30% · 20% · 10%, best first), counting players who played for the club at the time. Places it couldn't fill count at the lowest rating among ranked players. Gaps are weeks without any ranked player.
| Season | Strength at end | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 1578 | #39 of 86 |
| 2015/2016 | 1593 | #41 of 88 |
| 2016/2017 | 1614 | #42 of 91 |
| 2017/2018 | 1532 | #52 of 88 |
| 2018/2019 | 1302 | #75 of 92 |
| 2019/2020 | 1292 | #82 of 100 |
| 2020/2021 | 1289 | #74 of 92 |
| 2021/2022 | 772 | #83 of 84 |
| 2022/2023 | 797 | #91 of 94 |
No ranked players: nobody from Askim has played men's singles in the last 12 months.
The club's strength at the end of each week: a weighted average of the club's best 4 players (40% · 30% · 20% · 10%, best first), counting players who played for the club at the time. Places it couldn't fill count at the lowest rating among ranked players. Gaps are weeks without any ranked player.
| 981 |
| 1288 |
| 1035 |
| 1211 |
| −1.46 |
| 2020/2021 | 1289 | 977 | 1288 | 1035 | 1211 | −1.44 |
| 2021/2022 | 772 | 1006 | 1269 | 1076 | 1138 | −1.42 |
| 2022/2023 | 797 | – | 1244 | 1067 | 1168 | – |
| 2023/2024 | – | – | 1119 | 1052 | 1074 | – |
| 2024/2025 | – | – | 1034 | 1215 | 1194 | – |
| 2025/2026 | – | 1024 | 1166 | 1055 | 1057 | – |
| 2026/2027 | – | 1024 | 1002 | – | 1057 | – |
Values at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
| Season | Strength at end | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 778 | #62 of 70 |
| 2015/2016 | 991 | #64 of 74 |
| 2016/2017 | 975 | #65 of 70 |
| 2017/2018 | 1038 | #60 of 69 |
| 2018/2019 | 1059 | #58 of 70 |
| 2019/2020 | 981 | #64 of 73 |
| 2020/2021 | 977 | #58 of 68 |
| 2021/2022 | 1006 | #59 of 71 |
| 2025/2026 | 1024 | #66 of 83 |
| 2026/2027 | 1024 | #68 of 91 |
2 ranked players · #68 of the strongest clubs (strength 1024)
| # | Player | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 342 | Wenche Teglborg | 1270 ±412 |
| 448 | Hannah Huahong Wang | 1181 ±308 |
# is the national rank in women's singles.
The club's strength at the end of each week: a weighted average of the club's best 3 pairs: its two best players, the next two and so on (50% · 33% · 17%, best first), counting players who played for the club at the time. Places it couldn't fill count at the lowest rating among ranked players. Gaps are weeks without any ranked player.
| Season | Strength at end | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 1495 | #36 of 83 |
| 2015/2016 | 1532 | #30 of 88 |
| 2016/2017 | 1525 | #34 of 91 |
| 2017/2018 | 1401 | #56 of 90 |
| 2018/2019 | 1309 | #69 of 91 |
| 2019/2020 | 1288 | #77 of 98 |
| 2020/2021 | 1288 | #71 of 90 |
| 2021/2022 | 1269 | #66 of 83 |
| 2022/2023 | 1244 | #73 of 88 |
| 2023/2024 | 1119 | #81 of 94 |
| 2024/2025 | 1034 | #92 of 97 |
| 2025/2026 | 1166 | #86 of 101 |
| 2026/2027 | 1002 | #119 of 119 |
1 ranked player · #119 of the strongest clubs (strength 1002)
| # | Player | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 913 | Kristin Thømt | 1333 ±203 |
# is the national rank in men's doubles.
The club's strength at the end of each week: a weighted average of the club's best 3 pairs: its two best players, the next two and so on (50% · 33% · 17%, best first), counting players who played for the club at the time. Places it couldn't fill count at the lowest rating among ranked players. Gaps are weeks without any ranked player.
| Season | Strength at end | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 967 | #59 of 62 |
| 2015/2016 | 1102 | #61 of 65 |
| 2016/2017 | 1032 | #66 of 70 |
| 2017/2018 | 1106 | #61 of 65 |
| 2018/2019 | 1044 | #65 of 68 |
| 2019/2020 | 1035 | #65 of 72 |
| 2020/2021 | 1035 | #63 of 68 |
| 2021/2022 | 1076 | #60 of 64 |
| 2022/2023 | 1067 | #61 of 67 |
| 2023/2024 | 1052 | #69 of 73 |
| 2024/2025 | 1215 | #61 of 71 |
| 2025/2026 | 1055 | #73 of 76 |
No ranked players: nobody from Askim has played women's doubles in the last 12 months.
The club's strength at the end of each week: a weighted average of the club's best 4 pairs, its best man with its best woman, its second best man with its second best woman and so on (40% · 30% · 20% · 10%, best first), counting players who played for the club at the time. Places it couldn't fill count at the lowest rating among ranked players. Gaps are weeks without any ranked player.
| Season | Strength at end | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 1242 | #58 of 69 |
| 2015/2016 | 1221 | #61 of 75 |
| 2016/2017 | 1216 | #58 of 75 |
| 2017/2018 | 1261 | #56 of 74 |
| 2018/2019 | 1264 | #61 of 76 |
| 2019/2020 | 1211 | #61 of 77 |
| 2020/2021 | 1211 | #59 of 70 |
| 2021/2022 | 1138 | #59 of 70 |
| 2022/2023 | 1168 | #56 of 76 |
| 2023/2024 | 1074 | #70 of 83 |
| 2024/2025 | 1194 | #67 of 82 |
| 2025/2026 | 1057 | #72 of 87 |
| 2026/2027 | 1057 | #74 of 90 |
No ranked players: nobody from Askim has played mixed doubles in the last 12 months.