Eliteserien 2026/2027

How strong the eight teams are, from their players' ratings.

Earlier seasons in review, predicted against actual results: 2025/26, 2024/25, 2023/24, 2022/23, 2021/22

A tie is 8 matches: 2 men's singles, 2 women's singles, 1 men's doubles, 1 women's doubles and 2 mixed doubles, and a player plays at most 2 of them. Each team is assumed to field the lineup that gives it the most expected match wins against an average Eliteserien opponent. As the rules require, the first singles player has more official ranking points than the second, and the first mixed pair more combined mixed doubles points than the second (ranking 14.10.2025 til 13.10.2026). Win chances use the same formula as the ratings, match against match, and a tie is won with 5 matches and drawn at 4-4. Table points per tie are as in the league: 4-0 for winning 6-2 or better, 3-1 for 5-3 and 2-2 for 4-4.

Teams are from Norges Badmintonforbund's list, including players on loan from other clubs. Players without a doubles or mixed rating are counted as starting doubles from their singles rating (marked ≈).

Predicted table

The regular season, with one tie against each other team, by expected table points.

#	Team	Table points	Matches won per tie	Wins tie	Draw	Loses tie
1	Kristiansand	27.0	6.76 of 8	98%	2%	0%
2	Haugerud	18.9	4.85 of 8	63%	17%	20%
3	Frogner	16.9	4.51 of 8	52%	19%	29%
4	Bergen	16.4	4.38 of 8	50%	19%	30%
5	Moss	13.7	3.91 of 8	39%	19%	42%
6	Sotra	11.9	3.60 of 8	31%	20%	49%
7	NTNUI	4.2	2.02 of 8	8%	9%	83%
8	Klemetsrud	2.9	1.97 of 8	3%	7%	90%

Expected values: table points add up over the seven ties (28 at most), the other columns are averages per tie.

Head to head

Chance that the team on the left wins a tie against the team at the top. Hover for the expected score.

	Kristiansand	Haugerud	Frogner	Bergen	Moss	Sotra	NTNUI	Klemetsrud
Kristiansand	–	92%	97%	98%	99%	>99%	>99%	>99%
Haugerud	1%	–	43%	62%	63%	75%	98%	99%
Frogner	<1%	24%	–	23%	54%	65%	99%	>99%
Bergen	<1%	8%	41%	–	52%	57%	96%	98%
Moss	<1%	12%	16%	16%	–	41%	92%	95%
Sotra	<1%	5%	9%	13%	26%	–	79%	88%
NTNUI	<1%	<1%	<1%	<1%	1%	5%	–	52%
Klemetsrud	<1%	<1%	<1%	<1%	<1%	2%	19%	–

1. Kristiansand

27.0 expected table points · 6.76 matches won per tie · wins 98% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Torjus Flåtten	78%
2. Men's singles	Andreas Andersen Roksvåg	81%
1. Women's singles	Vilde Espeseth	94%
2. Women's singles	Sofia Louis Macsali	98%
Men's doubles	Mads Marum + Jonas Østhassel	82%
Women's doubles	Stine Skjævesland Pedersen + Sofia Louis Macsali	46%
1. Mixed doubles	Jonas Østhassel + Vilde Espeseth	90%
2. Mixed doubles	Torjus Flåtten + Stine Skjævesland Pedersen	90%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Vilde Espeseth	2950	2130	2099	832 / 264
Sofia Louis Macsali	2760	2023	1862	488 / 156
Stine Skjævesland Pedersen	1895	1801	1770	150 / 154
June Bøhn	1711	1727	1726	0 / 54
Rikke Østhassel	1668	1602	1707	28 / 66
Torjus Flåtten	2927	2183	2232	588 / 580
Andreas Andersen RoksvågLoan from Grimstad	2596	1983	1878	452 / 260
Mads Marum	2437	2027	1899	620 / 217
Jonas Østhassel	2409	2202	2230	0 / 1108
Filip Bøhn	2282	2001	1839	0 / 142
Sander Østhassel	1691	1943	1771	0 / 96

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

2. Haugerud

18.9 expected table points · 4.85 matches won per tie · wins 63% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Aleksander Jakovlevs	49%
2. Men's singles	Mathias Wong	71%
1. Women's singles	Sofie Jin Reistadbakk	3%
2. Women's singles	Elisa Wiborg	37%
Men's doubles	Carl Christian Mork + Sturla Flåten Jørgensen	36%
Women's doubles	Aimee Hong + Julie Marie Andersen Abusdal	78%
1. Mixed doubles	Carl Christian Mork + Aimee Hong	62%
2. Mixed doubles	Sturla Flåten Jørgensen + Julie Marie Andersen Abusdal	86%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Julie Marie Andersen Abusdal	2345	1946	2025	384 / 1008
Elisa Wiborg	2152	1793	1762	0 / 317
Sofie Jin Reistadbakk	2147	1705	1812	112 / 552
Nancy Hang	2021	1623	1590	224 / 365
Aimee Hong	1676	2068	2091	0 / 1264
Aleksander Jakovlevs	2755	1884	1800	912 / 362
Mathias Wong	2524	1876	1816	288 / 80
Carl Christian Mork	2213	2059	2010	0 / 680
Sturla Flåten Jørgensen	2140	1900	1934	192 / 584

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

3. Frogner

16.9 expected table points · 4.51 matches won per tie · wins 52% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Vegard Rikheim	55%
2. Men's singles	Jonas Christensen	10%
1. Women's singles	Randi Selle	38%
2. Women's singles	Emilia Petersen Norberg	41%
Men's doubles	Vegard Rikheim + Magnus Christensen	79%
Women's doubles	Marie Christensen + Randi Selle	53%
1. Mixed doubles	Magnus Christensen + Emilia Petersen Norberg	42%
2. Mixed doubles	Jonas Christensen + Marie Christensen	62%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Randi SelleLoan from Stavanger	2519	1893	1942	492 / 505
Emilia Petersen Norberg	2176	1890	1977	73 / 293
Vilma Aasheim-Engen	2016	1674	1605	12 / 0
Marie Christensen	1909	1971	1903	37 / 740
Monica Halvorsen	1851	1776	1729	9 / 49
Marthe Skaug	1851	1746	1629	18 / 12
Henny Lyfjell	1801	1639	1602	91 / 28
Hege RikheimNo rated matches	–	–	–	0 / 0
Vegard Rikheim	2789	2132	2049	320 / 416
Magnus Christensen	2202	2071	2019	37 / 642
Jonas Christensen	2117	1857	1878	9 / 0
Roshan Simha Chembeti	2092	1558	1727	266 / 32
Anders Leirud	2028	1776	1682	0 / 0
Albert Aasheim-Engen	1922	1557	1633	12 / 9
Nikolai Svensson	1829	1686	1631	51 / 28

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

4. Bergen

16.4 expected table points · 4.38 matches won per tie · wins 50% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Markus Barth	94%
2. Men's singles	Deeptanshu Toka	34%
1. Women's singles	Katja Botcharova Ellingsen	79%
2. Women's singles	Vera Botcharova Ellingsen	69%
Men's doubles	Bharath Kumar Balasingam + Deeptanshu Toka	5%
Women's doubles	Vera Botcharova Ellingsen + Maria Botcharova Ellingsen	29%
1. Mixed doubles	Amund Rikheim Huus + Maria Botcharova Ellingsen	9%
2. Mixed doubles	Markus Barth + Katja Botcharova Ellingsen	59%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Katja Botcharova Ellingsen	2756	1800	1858	1384 / 849
Maria Botcharova Ellingsen	2351	1851	1820	160 / 176
Vera Botcharova Ellingsen	2330	1877	1735	161 / 96
Giulia Dell'Acqua	2231	1784	1635	80 / 24
Markus Barth	3111	2038	1910	924 / 49
Amund Rikheim Huus	2518	1810	1916	1124 / 832
Deeptanshu Toka	2318	1821	1739	206 / 57
Bharath Kumar Balasingam	2304	1815	1670	1008 / 148
Simon Andrés Vasquez Frisnes	2213	1766	1661	76 / 36
Javier Ricardo Bish Cegarra	1570	1529	1501	0 / 0

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

5. Moss

13.7 expected table points · 3.91 matches won per tie · wins 39% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Shubham	54%
2. Men's singles	Martin Enghaug	28%
1. Women's singles	Emma Yasmin Ruud	8%
2. Women's singles	Mina Korssund	52%
Men's doubles	Shubham + Fredrik Kristensen	21%
Women's doubles	Solvår S Flåten Jørgensen + Mina Korssund	52%
1. Mixed doubles	Martin Enghaug + Emma Yasmin Ruud	2%
2. Mixed doubles	Fredrik Kristensen + Solvår S Flåten Jørgensen	86%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Emma Yasmin Ruud	2266	1773	1748	444 / 500
Mina Korssund	2235	1910	1695	52 / 0
Solvår S Flåten Jørgensen	2006	1948	1941	0 / 552
Alice Løvås Walbom	1886	1527	1524	42 / 126
Natalie Kristensen	1595	1771	1782	0 / 0
Shubham	2784	1918	1883	888 / 144
Martin Enghaug	2285	1718	1805	616 / 528
Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug	2274	1713	1451	432 / 1
Fredrik Kristensen	2178	1946	2010	224 / 413
Jørgen Rosenlund	2110	1778	1721	264 / 432

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

6. Sotra

11.9 expected table points · 3.60 matches won per tie · wins 31% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Ole Kristian Lie	2%
2. Men's singles	Mattias Xu	58%
1. Women's singles	Linnea Holmedal	46%
2. Women's singles	Oline Langeland Risa	55%
Men's doubles	Mathias Ji Hong + Mattias Xu	32%
Women's doubles	Oline Langeland Risa + Linnea Holmedal	54%
1. Mixed doubles	Keveen Kumar Balasingam + Vilde Morvik Ekerhovd	1%
2. Mixed doubles	Mathias Ji Hong + Juli Helen Johansen Klungtveit	42%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Linnea Holmedal	2559	1959	1827	684 / 259
Oline Langeland Risa	2248	1910	1860	209 / 264
Jenny Rajkumar	1956	1654	1584	0 / 0
Juli Helen Johansen Klungtveit	1916	1681	1697	64 / 93
Vilde Morvik Ekerhovd	1649	1621	1626	56 / 80
Mattias Xu	2449	1933	1929	9 / 384
Ole Kristian Lie	2253	1807	1764	176 / 60
Jakob Langeland Risa	2161	1838	1725	119 / 184
Keveen Kumar Balasingam	2095	1681	1797	556 / 240
Sindre Gjuvsland	1844	1702	1683	136 / 161
Mathias Ji Hong	1600	2003	1982	0 / 151

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

7. NTNUI

4.2 expected table points · 2.02 matches won per tie · wins 8% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Brynjar Hus	8%
2. Men's singles	Petter Tryland Laheld	38%
1. Women's singles	Nora Omdal	3%
2. Women's singles	Karina Elisabeth Andreassen	16%
Men's doubles	Brynjar Hus + Petter Tryland Laheld	18%
Women's doubles	Nora Omdal + Celina Mi Le Thanh	4%
1. Mixed doubles	Kevin Elson + Sara Buvik	1%
2. Mixed doubles	Henrik Buvik + Celina Mi Le Thanh	30%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Nora Omdal	2128	1726	1575	1016 / 230
Karina Elisabeth Andreassen	2008	1608	1667	130 / 0
Sara Buvik	1690	1614	1660	68 / 732
Celina Mi Le ThanhLoan from OSI	1674	1700	1735	188 / 420
Marlen Nygård	1634	1588	1578	33 / 437
Brynjar Hus	2442	1913	1901	1224 / 560
Petter Tryland Laheld	2344	1923	1909	1128 / 668
Boyan Yu	2192	1789	1749	383 / 258
Henrik Buvik	2099	1840	1875	374 / 244
Kevin Elson	1963	1743	1818	128 / 441
Iver Rolvsjord	1878	1741	1495	112 / 54
Gard Vik Langhammer	1853	1588	1095	228 / 56

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.

8. Klemetsrud

2.9 expected table points · 1.97 matches won per tie · wins 3% of ties

Strongest lineup

With the chance of winning each match against an average Eliteserien opponent

1. Men's singles	Carlo Alonzo Agustin	3%
2. Men's singles	Aldrin Nelson	82%
1. Women's singles	Sennova Lindland	21%
2. Women's singles	Evita Gedgaudaite	4%
Men's doubles	Jonathan Larsen + Aldrin Nelson	8%
Women's doubles	Milaniia Petrina + Sennova Lindland	4%
1. Mixed doubles	Carlo Alonzo Agustin + Milaniia Petrina	0%
2. Mixed doubles	Jonathan Larsen + Evita Gedgaudaite	9%

Players

Player	Singles	Doubles	Mixed	Points
Sennova LindlandLoan from Mandal	2410	1750	1595	288 / 160
Evita Gedgaudaite	1818	1529	1502	0 / 8
Amal Mariia Elrozi	1800	1543	1498	248 / 158
Milaniia Petrina	1781	1696	1578	26 / 152
Aldrin Nelson	2607	1859	1852	240 / 76
Jonathan Larsen	2328	1864	1919	364 / 288
Carlo Alonzo Agustin	2320	1676	1735	476 / 244
Christer Andersen	2019	1754	1693	20 / 28
Dev Singh Jassal	1968	1560	1656	87 / 8
Magnus Tjøm	1914	1627	1601	34 / 14
Shreyas Danve	1826	1571	1510	18 / 64
Vinit Sharma	1754	1506	1410	52 / 38
Rasmus Ovesen	1647	1476	≈1588	16 / 0
Leonard AlchazNo rated matches	–	–	–	0 / 0
Filip Isdal LarsenNo rated matches	–	–	–	0 / 0

≈ estimated: no rating in that discipline yet. Points: official ranking points in singles / mixed doubles, which decide who plays first singles and first mixed. Men first, then women, by singles rating.