Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Johannes Daniel Selnes | Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 2 |
| Sets won | 1 | 5 |
| Points won | 7638.0% | 12462.0% |
| Average winning margin | – | 24.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-5, 21-12+25 points · 8 Feb 2015 · mixed doubles |
0 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Johannes Daniel Selnes won 21-19, 19-21 (level on points) on 29 Oct 2017.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Johannes Daniel Selnes's chance of winning against Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Rating at the end of each week
From Johannes Daniel Selnes's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2017 | Adrian Janitz 1338 / Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen 1365with Sofie Miko Lambrects 1120U13 Oslofjorden Pulje 1 (1. MD)L5869 43207+17495 vs 17574+43821 | Draw ±021-19, 19-21 | 13% | 1337+4.5 |
| 2 Apr 2016 | Noa Norden 1358 / Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen 1360with Marlen Nygård 1149Oslofjorden U13 Pulje 1 (1. MD)L3400 24789+17495 vs 17574+26665 | Lost −238-21, 11-21 | 8% | 1241−4.5 |
| 8 Feb 2015 | Jens Karlsen 1327 / Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen 1274with Linnea Griffin 1195U13 Østlandet Pulje 1 (1. MD)L2354 17574+29894 vs 23647+17495 | Lost −255-21, 12-21 | 27% | 1262−15.4 |
Rating at the end of each week
Met 3 times in mixed doubles: Johannes Daniel Selnes won 0, lost 2, drew 1.
| Measure | Johannes Daniel Selnes | Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 2 |
| Sets won | 1 | 5 |
| Points won | 7638.0% | 12462.0% |
| Average winning margin | – | 24.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-5, 21-12+25 points · 8 Feb 2015 |
0 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Johannes Daniel Selnes won 21-19, 19-21 (level on points) on 29 Oct 2017.
Rating at the end of each week