Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 5 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Magnus Knapperholen | Morten Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 4 | 1 |
| Sets won | 8 | 2 |
| Points won | 19353.8% | 16646.2% |
| Average winning margin | 11.0 points | 17.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-8, 21-16+18 points · 28 Sep 2019 · men's singles | 21-10, 21-15+17 points · 18 Nov 2017 · men's singles |
0 of 5 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Magnus Knapperholen won 21-16, 21-19 (by 7 points) on 17 Nov 2018.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Magnus Knapperholen's chance of winning against Morten Aarhus. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Magnus Knapperholen
- 1583 ±287
- Not ranked · peak 1743
- Morten Aarhus
- 1615 ±264
- #245 · peak 1641
44% Magnus KnapperholenMorten Aarhus 56%
Met 4 times in men's singles: Magnus Knapperholen won 3, lost 1.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Magnus Knapperholen | Morten Aarhus |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 3 | 1 |
| Sets won | 6 | 2 |
| Points won | 15153.5% |
Matches against each other
From Magnus Knapperholen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Nov 2019 | Morten Aarhus 1193Asker Asker Open (SEN A)T6239 17883 vs 24977 | Won +1021-16, 21-16 | 94% | 1557+3.9 |
| 2 Nov 2019 | Morten Aarhus 1235Frogner Frognerhøna (SEN A)T6229 17883 vs 24977 | Won +921-18, 21-15 | 91% | 1534+5.8 |
| 28 Sep 2019 | Morten Aarhus 1403Sandefjord SaBK Ferske Fjes (SEN A)T6293 17883 vs 24977 | Won +1821-8, 21-16 | 82% | 1623+21.5 |
| 17 Nov 2018 | Morten Aarhus 1422 / Frank Heggen 1434with Carl Magnus Woldstad 1454Asker Asker Open (SEN A)T6117 43260+17883 vs 24977+26628 | Won +721-16, 21-19 | 56% | 1443+10.4 |
| 18 Nov 2017 | Morten Aarhus 1474Asker Asker Open (SEN A)T6007 24977 vs 17883 | Lost −1710-21, 15-21 | 65% | 1473−79.7 |