Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Line Klæbo | Anders Heldal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 1 | 8 |
| Points won | 14945.4% | 17954.6% |
| Average winning margin | – | 10.5 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-13, 21-13+16 points · 16 Sep 2023 · mixed doubles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Anders Heldal won 9-21, 21-18, 21-18 (by 6 points) on 4 May 2025.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Line Klæbo's chance of winning against Anders Heldal. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Mixed doubles
- Line Klæbo
- 1165 ±135
- #687 among women · peak 1394
- Anders Heldal
- 1191 ±140
- #804 among men · peak 1279
45% Line KlæboAnders Heldal 55%
Met 4 times in mixed doubles: Line Klæbo won 0, lost 4.
Winning margins in mixed doubles
| Measure | Line Klæbo | Anders Heldal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 1 | 8 |
| Points won | 14945.4% | 179 |
Matches against each other
From Line Klæbo's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 May 2025 | Anders Heldal 1133 / Lena Heldal 1227with Magnus Severinsen 11392. divisjon Vest Pulje 1 (2. MD)L11785 48164+17952 vs 44548+38673 | Lost +621-9, 18-21, 18-21 | 16% | 1001−1.9 |
| 8 Feb 2025 | Anders Heldal 1160 / Lena Heldal 1254with Magnus Severinsen 1144Stanghelle IL Kraftsmashen (SEN C)T6869 44548+38673 vs 48164+17952 | Lost −1013-21, 21-23 | 12% | 1004−3.3 |
| 18 Jan 2025 | Lena Heldal 1255 / Anders Heldal 1161with Magnus Severinsen 1148Askøy Kretsmesterskap i Badmintonkretsen Vest / Askøy Open 2025 (SEN C)T6949 38673+44548 vs 17952+48164 | Lost −1019-21, 13-21 | 12% | 1007−3.6 |
| 16 Sep 2023 | Anders Heldal 1202 / Turid Gråberg 1211with Magnus Severinsen 1239BSI Bergen: BSI Smashen (SEN C)T6791 44548+45029 vs 17952+48164 | Lost −1613-21, 13-21 | 35% | 1079−16.1 |