Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Marit Ulmo | Kenneth Larsen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 5 |
| Points won | 13850.2% | 13749.8% |
| Average winning margin | 20.0 points | 9.5 points |
| Biggest win | 21-8, 15-21, 21-8+20 points · 31 Oct 2015 · mixed doubles | 21-17, 21-15+10 points · 2 Nov 2014 · mixed doubles |
2 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Kenneth Larsen won 7-21, 30-28, 21-0 (by 9 points) on 2 Nov 2013.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Marit Ulmo's chance of winning against Kenneth Larsen. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Met 3 times in mixed doubles: Marit Ulmo won 1, lost 2.
| Measure | Marit Ulmo | Kenneth Larsen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 5 |
| Points won | 13850.2% | 137 |
From Marit Ulmo's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2015 | Kenneth Larsen 1791 / Marlene Wåland 1782with Ikmal Hussain Jaafar 1500Eliteserien grunnspill Pulje 1 (1. MD)L3538 23981+20617 vs 36286+18595 | Won +2021-8, 15-21, 21-8 | 6% | 1746+35.6 |
| 2 Nov 2014 | Kenneth Larsen 1683 / Randi Selle 1700with Carl Christian Hem 1670Eliteserien grunnspill Pulje 1 (1. MD)L1170 23981+18748 vs 18638+18595 | Lost −1017-21, 15-21 | 43% | 1657−21.4 |
| 2 Nov 2013 | Kenneth Larsen 1500 / Hege Malene Ulstein 1500with Carl Christian Hem 1515Eliteserien - Grunnspill Pulje 1 (1. MD)L1008 23981+19636 vs 18638+18595 | Lost −921-7, 28-30, 0-21 | 53% | 1476−24.0 |
| Average winning margin | 20.0 points | 9.5 points |
|---|
| Biggest win | 21-8, 15-21, 21-8+20 points · 31 Oct 2015 | 21-17, 21-15+10 points · 2 Nov 2014 |
|---|
2 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Kenneth Larsen won 7-21, 30-28, 21-0 (by 9 points) on 2 Nov 2013.
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week