Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Arne Kristian Helgestad | Gunnhild Bøyum |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 2 |
| Sets won | 4 | 5 |
| Points won | 15848.6% | 16751.4% |
| Average winning margin | 9.5 points | 14.0 points |
| Biggest win | 18-21, 21-17, 21-12+10 points · 3 Nov 2018 | 21-9, 21-15+18 points · 17 Jun 2016 |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Arne Kristian Helgestad won 21-18, 21-15 (by 9 points) on 10 Mar 2017.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Arne Kristian Helgestad's chance of winning against Gunnhild Bøyum. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Mixed doubles
- Arne Kristian Helgestad
- 1252 ±243
- Not ranked · peak 1488
- Gunnhild Bøyum
- 1258 ±207
- #495 among women · peak 1394
49% Arne Kristian HelgestadGunnhild Bøyum 51%
Met 4 times in mixed doubles: Arne Kristian Helgestad won 2, lost 2.
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Arne Kristian Helgestad
- Gunnhild Bøyum
Matches against each other
From Arne Kristian Helgestad's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2018 | Tom Storgaard 1412 / Gunnhild Bøyum 1328with Aina Anmarkrud 1491Frogner Frognerhøna (SEN C)T6166 18474+20119 vs 19959+18587 | Won +1018-21, 21-17, 21-12 | 84% | 1465+2.9 |
| 10 Mar 2017 | Gunnhild Bøyum 1362 / Dag Esvall 1382with Aina Anmarkrud 1476Asker Veteranmesterskapet (O50 A)T4846 18474+20119 vs 18587+19774 | Won +921-18, 21-15 | 81% | 1459+4.4 |
| 17 Jun 2016 | Gunnhild Bøyum 1300 / Sigbjørn Krunenes 1526with Anne Gro Rikheim 1468Fron Midtsommernatt 2016 (SEN C)T2792 18587+21591 vs 18472+20119 | Lost −189-21, 15-21 | 60% | 1381−30.0 |
| 21 Mar 2015 | Ola Gunnes 1402 / Gunnhild Bøyum 1323with Liping Mu 13572. divisjon Østlandet sluttspill Sluttspill 1 (1. MD)L2669 19396+18587 vs 20119+17279 | Lost −1013-21, 19-21 | 52% | 1366−11.4 |