Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 11 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Ida Høyland W. | Emma Wåland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 10 |
| Sets won | 3 | 20 |
| Points won | 35042.5% | 47357.5% |
| Average winning margin | 11.0 points | 13.4 points |
| Biggest win | 21-12, 24-22+11 points · 13 Jan 2017 · women's singles | 21-12, 21-6+24 points · 9 Sep 2016 · mixed doubles |
1 of 11 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Emma Wåland won 17-21, 21-14, 23-21 (by 5 points) on 5 Sep 2014.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Ida Høyland W.'s chance of winning against Emma Wåland. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Met 4 times in women's singles: Ida Høyland W. won 1, lost 3.
| Measure | Ida Høyland W. | Emma Wåland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 3 | 6 |
| Points won | 16147.4% | 179 |
From Ida Høyland W.'s side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Sep 2017 | Emma Wåland 2081Haugerud RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T5944 20863 vs 21081 | Lost −167-21, 19-21 | 44% | 1975−72.5 |
| 8 Sep 2017 | Emma Wåland 1670 / Live Hov Grønbech 1614with Henny Lyfjell 1692Haugerud RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T5944 20863+22122 vs 21081+22416 | Lost −1018-21, 14-21 | 64% | 1619−48.5 |
| 13 Jan 2017 | Emma Wåland 2021Bygdø RT 13 + NRSenior* (SEN E)T4841 21081 vs 20863 | Won +1121-12, 24-22 | 52% | 2069+37.1 |
| 9 Sep 2016 | Mads Marum 1690 / Emma Wåland 1773with Henrik Skjønhaug 1525Haugerud RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T4832 20623+20863 vs 22213+21081 | Lost −2412-21, 6-21 | 3% | 1465−8.2 |
| 21 Nov 2015 | Emma Wåland 2099Frogner RT 17* (U17 X)T723 20863 vs 21081 | Lost −818-21, 16-21 | 21% | 1916−11.7 |
| 6 Nov 2015 | Emma Wåland 1681 / Thea Tønnesen 1663with Henny Lyfjell 1591Karmøy RT 13 + 19* (U19 A)T720 20863+21285 vs 21081+22416 | Lost −1810-21, 14-21 | 20% | 1531−39.2 |
| 23 Oct 2015 | Thea Tønnesen 1645 / Emma Wåland 1663with Henny Lyfjell 1563Asker U23-mesterskapet 2015 (SEN E)T719 21285+20863 vs 21081+22416 | Lost −1015-21, 17-21 | 17% | 1520−13.7 |
| 4 Sep 2015 | Emma Wåland 1682 / Thea Tønnesen 1677with Henny Lyfjell 1513Djerv RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T716 20863+21285 vs 21081+22416 | Lost −1412-21, 16-21 | 8% | 1522−12.6 |
| 13 Mar 2015 | Thea Tønnesen 1599 / Emma Wåland 1618with Vilde Morvik Ekerhovd 1511Frogner RT 13 + 19* (U19 A)T564 21285+20863 vs 21081+22729 | Lost −819-21, 15-21 | 22% | 1530−10.2 |
| 13 Mar 2015 | Emma Wåland 1705 / Sturla Flåten Jørgensen 1735with Henrik Skjønhaug 1284Frogner RT 13 + 19* (U19 A)T564 20863+19566 vs 22213+21081 | Lost −2111-21, 10-21 | <1% | 1336−0.2 |
| 5 Sep 2014 | Emma Wåland 1626Sandefjord RT 17 + NRSenior (U17 A)T552 20863 vs 21081 | Lost −521-17, 14-21, 21-23 | 34% | 1532−6.5 |
| Average winning margin | 11.0 points | 9.7 points |
|---|
| Biggest win | 21-12, 24-22+11 points · 13 Jan 2017 | 21-7, 21-19+16 points · 8 Sep 2017 |
|---|
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Emma Wåland won 17-21, 21-14, 23-21 (by 5 points) on 5 Sep 2014.
Rating at the end of each week
Met 5 times in women's doubles: Ida Høyland W. won 0, lost 5.
| Measure | Ida Høyland W. | Emma Wåland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 5 |
| Sets won | 0 | 10 |
| Points won | 15041.7% | 21058.3% |
| Average winning margin | – | 12.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-10, 21-14+18 points · 6 Nov 2015 |
0 of 5 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Emma Wåland won 21-19, 21-15 (by 8 points) on 13 Mar 2015.
Rating at the end of each week
Met 2 times in mixed doubles: Ida Høyland W. won 0, lost 2.
| Measure | Ida Høyland W. | Emma Wåland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 2 |
| Sets won | 0 | 4 |
| Points won | 3931.7% | 8468.3% |
| Average winning margin | – | 22.5 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-12, 21-6+24 points · 9 Sep 2016 |
0 of 2 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Emma Wåland won 21-11, 21-10 (by 21 points) on 13 Mar 2015.
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week