Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Dina Høl Bugge | Sofie Aamodt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 4 | 6 |
| Points won | 18650.0% | 18650.0% |
| Average winning margin | 14.0 points | 4.7 points |
| Biggest win | 22-20, 21-9+14 points · 15 Mar 2019 · women's singles | 18-21, 21-16, 21-17+6 points · 17 Mar 2018 · women's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Sofie Aamodt won 12-21, 21-18, 21-13 (by 2 points) on 15 Mar 2019.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Dina Høl Bugge's chance of winning against Sofie Aamodt. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Dina Høl Bugge
- 1782 ±276
- #70 · peak 1855
- Sofie Aamodt
- 1551 ±456
- Not ranked · peak 1775
85% Dina Høl BuggeSofie Aamodt 15%
Met 1 time in women's singles: Dina Høl Bugge won 1, lost 0.
Winning margins in women's singles
| Measure | Dina Høl Bugge | Sofie Aamodt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 0 |
| Sets won | 2 | 0 |
| Points won | 4359.7% |
Matches against each other
From Dina Høl Bugge's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Mar 2019 | Sofie Aamodt 1737Sotra RT 13 + RT 17 * + NRSenior (U17 A)T6091 22355 vs 26780 | Won +1422-20, 21-9 | 48% | 1790+63.9 |
| 15 Mar 2019 | Sofie Aamodt 1555 / Karina Elisabeth Andreassen 1607with Elise Holmedal 1484Sotra RT 13 + RT 17 * + NRSenior (U17 A)T6091 26780+24320 vs 17943+22355 | Lost −221-12, 18-21, 13-21 | 35% | 1591−2.8 |
| 17 Mar 2018 | Sofie Aamodt 1486 / Victoria Zhang 1550with Elise Holmedal 1587Djerv RT 17* (U17 A)T5959 26780+26755 vs 17943+22355 | Lost −621-18, 16-21, 17-21 | 65% | 1511−15.9 |
| 11 Nov 2017 | Sofie Aamodt 1499 / Victoria Zhang 1536with Elise Holmedal 1401Leksvik RT 17* (U17 A)T5949 26780+26755 vs 17943+22355 | Lost −620-22, 17-21 | 19% | 1436−7.7 |