Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Vetle Skadberg | Agus Darmawan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 3 | 7 |
| Points won | 17044.5% | 21255.5% |
| Average winning margin | 3.0 points | 15.0 points |
| Biggest win | 20-22, 21-18, 23-21+3 points · 27 Sep 2014 · men's singles | 21-12, 21-11+19 points · 1 Oct 2016 · men's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Vetle Skadberg won 20-22, 21-18, 23-21 (by 3 points) on 27 Sep 2014.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Vetle Skadberg's chance of winning against Agus Darmawan. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Vetle Skadberg
- 1485 ±520
- Not ranked · peak 1517
- Agus Darmawan
- 1479 ±236
- #386 · peak 1545
51% Vetle SkadbergAgus Darmawan 49%
Met 1 time in men's singles: Vetle Skadberg won 1, lost 0.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Vetle Skadberg | Agus Darmawan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 0 |
| Sets won | 2 | 1 |
| Points won | 6451.2% | 61 |
Matches against each other
From Vetle Skadberg's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Oct 2016 | Fery Simbolon 1495 / Agus Darmawan 1474with Eirik Silgjerd 1390Stavanger Stavanger Open 2016 (SEN C)T5865.2 18204+18203 vs 22532+22397 | Lost −1527-25, 15-21, 10-21 | 12% | 1315−3.2 |
| 1 Oct 2016 | Fery Simbolon 1477 / Agus Darmawan 1453with Eirik Silgjerd 1360Stavanger Stavanger Open 2016 (SEN C)T5865 18204+18203 vs 22532+22397 | Lost −1912-21, 11-21 | 10% | 1277−6.6 |
| 27 Sep 2014 | Agus Darmawan 1313Sola Sola Rekrutten 2014 (SEN C)T603 22397 vs 18203 | Won +320-22, 21-18, 23-21 | 54% | 1336+4.7 |
| 27 Sep 2014 | Agus Darmawan 1389 / Fery Simbolon 1387with Eirik Silgjerd 1350Sola Sola Rekrutten 2014 (SEN C)T603 18203+18204 vs 22397+22532 | Lost −1112-21, 19-21 | 45% | 1389−13.1 |