Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Jorunn Rasmussen | Julie Langeland Risa |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 4 | 6 |
| Points won | 18249.2% | 18850.8% |
| Average winning margin | 17.0 points | 7.7 points |
| Biggest win | 21-14, 21-11+17 points · 25 Jan 2026 · mixed doubles | 16-21, 21-10, 21-10+17 points · 19 Jan 2019 · women's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Julie Langeland Risa won 21-19, 18-21, 21-18 (by 2 points) on 20 Jan 2018.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Jorunn Rasmussen's chance of winning against Julie Langeland Risa. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Jorunn Rasmussen
- 1601 ±272
- #123 · peak 1855
- Julie Langeland Risa
- 1528 ±198
- #154 · peak 1766
64% Jorunn RasmussenJulie Langeland Risa 36%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Jorunn Rasmussen
- Julie Langeland Risa
Matches against each other
From Jorunn Rasmussen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Jan 2026 | Ståle Skorpholm 1320 / Julie Langeland Risa 1471with Jan Frode Neverdal 18121.div. Sør/Vest Pulje 1 (2. MD)L13044 22850+23313 vs 18975+17138 | Won +1721-14, 21-11 | 99% | 1610+0.9 |
| 24 Apr 2022 | Anne Lie Foldnes 1502 / Julie Langeland Risa 1515with Britt Grindland 13611.div. Sør-Vest Pulje 1 (1. DD)L8707 42917+17138 vs 19439+23313 | Lost −419-21, 22-24 | 41% | 1600−8.3 |
| 19 Jan 2019 | Julie Langeland Risa 1570 / Vilde Morvik Ekerhovd 1621with Britt Grindland 15021.div. Sør/Vest Pulje 1 (1. DD)L6388 19439+23313 vs 17138+22729 | Lost −1721-16, 10-21, 10-21 | 47% | 1639−32.6 |
| 20 Jan 2018 | Julie Langeland Risa 1517 / Anne Lie Foldnes 1487with Britt Grindland 14591.div. Sør/Vest Pulje 1 (1. DD)L4978 19439+23313 vs 17138+42917 | Lost −219-21, 21-18, 18-21 | 67% | 1631−5.7 |