Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Petter Daleng | Martin Grøtterød |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 2 | 8 |
| Points won | 15442.8% | 20657.2% |
| Average winning margin | – | 13.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-8, 21-14+20 points · 15 Jan 2016 · men's singles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Martin Grøtterød won 21-12, 13-21, 21-15 (by 7 points) on 8 Nov 2014.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Petter Daleng's chance of winning against Martin Grøtterød. Singles and men's or women's doubles are only compared between players of the same gender. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Petter Daleng
- 1447 ±520
- Not ranked · peak 1452
- Martin Grøtterød
- 1666 ±385
- Not ranked · peak 1894
16% Petter DalengMartin Grøtterød 84%
Met 1 time in men's singles: Petter Daleng won 0, lost 1.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Petter Daleng | Martin Grøtterød |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 1 |
| Sets won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won |
Matches against each other
From Petter Daleng's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Jan 2016 | Martin Grøtterød 1715Sandefjord RT 15 + 19* (U19 A)T727 23098 vs 24826 | Lost −208-21, 14-21 | 11% | 1390−52.7 |
| 10 Apr 2015 | Martin Grøtterød 1451 / Erlend Stormo 1511with Kenneth Sanglay 1216Sandefjord UBM 2015 (U17 A)T565 23098+21961 vs 24826+24448 | Lost −1715-21, 10-21 | 6% | 1376−8.2 |
| 8 Nov 2014 | Martin Grøtterød 1431 / Erlend Stormo 1428with Sondre Sefland 1185Jarlsberg Jarlsbergosten 2014 (U17 A)T617 23098+21961 vs 24446+24826 | Lost −712-21, 21-13, 15-21 | 4% | 1260−1.9 |
| 11 Oct 2014 | Martin Grøtterød 1345 / Erlend Stormo 1342with Kenneth Sanglay 1240Frogner Frognerhøna (U17 A)T607 23098+21961 vs 24448+24826 | Lost −816-21, 27-25, 16-21 | 23% | 1282−10.1 |