Loading…
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Ngamata Pedersen | Joakim Andreassen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 2 | 5 |
| Points won | 13347.8% | 14552.2% |
| Average winning margin | 2.0 points | 7.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-18, 16-21, 21-17+2 points · 8 Oct 2016 · mixed doubles | 21-16, 26-24+7 points · 13 Oct 2018 · mixed doubles |
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Ngamata Pedersen won 21-18, 16-21, 21-17 (by 2 points) on 8 Oct 2016.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Ngamata Pedersen's chance of winning against Joakim Andreassen. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Met 3 times in mixed doubles: Ngamata Pedersen won 1, lost 2.
| Measure | Ngamata Pedersen | Joakim Andreassen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 2 | 5 |
| Points won | 13347.8% |
From Ngamata Pedersen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2018 | Elena Bogdanova 1371 / Joakim Andreassen 1400with Glenn Martin Ngametua Pedersen 1347Tana Tana Open 2018 (SEN B)T6134 35356+17511 vs 24892+24346 | Lost −716-21, 24-26 | 63% | 1487−8.0 |
| 8 Oct 2016 | Karina Elisabeth Andreassen 1478 / Joakim Andreassen 1257with Marek Kwiatkowski 1404Tana Tana Open 2016 (SEN B)T5915 24892+18395 vs 24320+17511 | Won +221-18, 16-21, 21-17 | 66% | 1421+2.0 |
| 10 Oct 2015 | Joakim Andreassen 1240 / Olga Vasilieva 1418with Benn Larsen 1329Tana Tana Open 2015 (SEN B)T2764 17511+23250 vs 35340+24892 | Lost −717-21, 18-21 | 66% | 1402−13.9 |
| 14552.2% |
| Average winning margin | 2.0 points | 7.0 points |
|---|
| Biggest win | 21-18, 16-21, 21-17+2 points · 8 Oct 2016 | 21-16, 26-24+7 points · 13 Oct 2018 |
|---|
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Ngamata Pedersen won 21-18, 16-21, 21-17 (by 2 points) on 8 Oct 2016.
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week