Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 9 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Jonatan Broch Granum | Jonathan Utne Madsøy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 7 |
| Sets won | 8 | 16 |
| Points won | 41146.3% | 47753.7% |
| Average winning margin | 5.0 points | 9.0 points |
| Biggest win | 17-21, 21-16, 21-17+5 points · 30 Oct 2021 · men's doubles | 21-14, 21-9+19 points · 30 Oct 2021 · men's singles |
6 of 9 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Jonathan Utne Madsøy won 14-21, 21-15, 22-20 (by 1 point) on 29 Nov 2020.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Jonatan Broch Granum's chance of winning against Jonathan Utne Madsøy. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Met 3 times in men's singles: Jonatan Broch Granum won 0, lost 3.
| Measure | Jonatan Broch Granum | Jonathan Utne Madsøy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 2 | 6 |
| Points won | 137 |
From Jonatan Broch Granum's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Mar 2023 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1820Sotra Norway Open 2023 RT 13ABC + 15*ABC + 17*ABC + 19*ABC og Regional U11ABC (U19 A)T6583 17693 vs 35324 | Lost −1023-25, 24-22, 11-21 | 37% | 1738−12.7 |
| 29 Jan 2023 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1505 / Lovise Krogsæter 1716with Nicoline Wærsten 15581.div. Sør-Vest 2022-23 Pulje 1 (1. MD)L9726 35324+36358 vs 17693+21199 | Lost −415-21, 21-16, 18-21 | 12% | 1396−1.4 |
| 18 Feb 2022 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1554 / Fredrik Hestenes 1445with Aslak Smith 1496Karmøy NM Junior (U19 A)T6462 17693+36430 vs 35324+43374 | Lost −521-14, 15-21, 15-21 | 43% | 1457−7.1 |
| 30 Oct 2021 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1717Sotra RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T6455 17693 vs 35324 | Lost −1914-21, 9-21 | 36% | 1586−54.1 |
| 30 Oct 2021 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1592 / Fredrik Hestenes 1456with Aslak Smith 1497Sotra RT 15 + 19 (U19 A)T6455 35324+43374 vs 17693+36430 | Won +517-21, 21-16, 21-17 | 34% | 1476+10.3 |
| 5 Dec 2020 | Kristoffer Sveen Hjertholm 1504 / Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1585with Aslak Smith 1482Kristiansand Pizzabaker-cup (U17 A)T6400 43079+17693 vs 43374+35324 | Lost −621-18, 16-21, 17-21 | 27% | 1471−1.7 |
| 29 Nov 2020 | Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1699Singelserie U17 og U19 Pulje 1 (2. HS)L8289 17693 vs 35324 | Lost −121-14, 15-21, 20-22 | 18% | 1501−0.9 |
| 23 Oct 2020 | Elias Øyen Selsaas 1614 / Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1576with Aslak Smith 1488Kristiansand RT 19 (U19 A)T6343 25058+17693 vs 35324+43374 | Lost −1811-21, 13-21 | 15% | 1472−7.2 |
| 21 Jan 2017 | Elias Øyen Selsaas 1349 / Jonathan Utne Madsøy 1151with Casper Stiansen 1211U13 Sør Pulje 1 (1. HD)L4119 35324+17199 vs 25058+17693 | Draw −811-21, 21-19 | 49% | 1282+0.5 |
| 16754.9% |
| Average winning margin | – | 10.0 points |
|---|
| Biggest win | – | 21-14, 21-9+19 points · 30 Oct 2021 |
|---|
2 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Jonathan Utne Madsøy won 14-21, 21-15, 22-20 (by 1 point) on 29 Nov 2020.
Rating at the end of each week
Met 5 times in men's doubles: Jonatan Broch Granum won 1, lost 3, drew 1.
| Measure | Jonatan Broch Granum | Jonathan Utne Madsøy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 5 | 8 |
| Points won | 22046.6% | 25253.4% |
| Average winning margin | 5.0 points | 9.7 points |
| Biggest win | 17-21, 21-16, 21-17+5 points · 30 Oct 2021 | 21-11, 21-13+18 points · 23 Oct 2020 |
3 of 5 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Jonathan Utne Madsøy won 14-21, 21-15, 21-15 (by 5 points) on 18 Feb 2022.
Rating at the end of each week
Met 1 time in mixed doubles: Jonatan Broch Granum won 0, lost 1.
| Measure | Jonatan Broch Granum | Jonathan Utne Madsøy |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 1 |
| Sets won | 1 | 2 |
| Points won | 5448.2% | 5851.8% |
| Average winning margin | – | 4.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-15, 16-21, 21-18+4 points · 29 Jan 2023 |
1 of 1 match went to a deciding set. Closest: Jonathan Utne Madsøy won 21-15, 16-21, 21-18 (by 4 points) on 29 Jan 2023.
Rating at the end of each week