Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 15 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Armand Bruun | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 4 | 11 |
| Sets won | 9 | 23 |
| Points won | 47343.2% | 62156.8% |
| Average winning margin | 11.0 points | 17.5 points |
| Biggest win | 19-21, 21-14, 21-10+16 points · 31 Jan 2020 · men's singles | 21-3, 21-11+28 points · 27 Jan 2018 · mixed doubles |
2 of 15 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness won 22-20, 23-21 (by 4 points) on 8 Apr 2018.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Armand Bruun's chance of winning against Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Armand Bruun
- 1563 ±430
- Not ranked · peak 1715
- Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness
- 1841 ±229
- #103 · peak 1842
11% Armand BruunHaakon Lærkerød Jelsness 89%
Met 6 times in men's singles: Armand Bruun won 2, lost 4.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Armand Bruun | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 4 |
| Sets won | 5 | 9 |
| Points won | 22446.6% |
Matches against each other
From Armand Bruun's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Mar 2020 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1606Djerv RT 15* (U15 A)T6208 36487 vs 24909 | Won +1121-13, 21-18 | 57% | 1661+15.5 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1474 / Mina Korssund 1316with Sofie Jin Reistadbakk 1330Vestre Aker Fjærfest (U15 A)T6284 38662+36487 vs 24909+35319 | Won +1021-15, 21-17 | 39% | 1427+23.4 |
| 31 Jan 2020 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1530Kristiansand UBM (U15 A)T6210 36487 vs 24909 | Won +1619-21, 21-14, 21-10 | 54% | 1572+20.2 |
| 31 Jan 2020 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1469 / Mina Korssund 1308with Sofie Jin Reistadbakk 1317Kristiansand UBM (U15 A)T6210 36487+38662 vs 24909+35319 | Won +721-17, 21-18 | 25% | 1341+22.5 |
| 19 Oct 2019 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1407Moss KM/Mossetreffen (U15 A)T6220 24909 vs 36487 | Lost −921-13, 11-21, 14-21 | 67% | 1482−19.4 |
| 13 Oct 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1588Bygdø Bygdø Høsttreff 2018 (U15 A)T6160 24909 vs 36487 | Lost −1418-21, 10-21 | 25% | 1426−17.8 |
| 13 Oct 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1469 / Aleksander Jakovlevs 1461with Mathias Wong 1449Bygdø Bygdø Høsttreff 2018 (U15 A)T6160 24909+36501 vs 36487+42944 | Lost −2014-21, 8-21 | 26% | 1327−18.1 |
| 8 Apr 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1454 / Philip Allport Fossum 1429with Mathias Wong 1338U13 Oslofjorden Sluttspill topp (1. HD)L6190 42944+36487 vs 24909+36336 | Lost −420-22, 21-23 | 13% | 1301−0.9 |
| 27 Jan 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1577Haugerud KM Oslofjorden Badmintonkrets (U13 A)T6061 24909 vs 36487 | Lost −1415-21, 13-21 | 12% | 1314−6.4 |
| 27 Jan 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1410 / Aleksander Jakovlevs 1361with Mathias Wong 1301Haugerud KM Oslofjorden Badmintonkrets (U13 A)T6061 24909+36501 vs 42944+36487 | Lost −168-21, 18-21 | 17% | 1257−5.7 |
| 27 Jan 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1429 / Kristine Grande Ødegårdstuen 1433with Emilie Lie Cook 1247Haugerud KM Oslofjorden Badmintonkrets (U13 A)T6061 24909+17495 vs 36508+36487 | Lost −283-21, 11-21 | 10% | 1324−6.8 |
| 12 Jan 2018 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1347 / Christer Andersen 1411with Mathias Wong 1275Bygdø RT 13 + NRSenior (U13 A)T5952 24909+26662 vs 42944+36487 | Lost −2313-21, 6-21 | 13% | 1228−7.1 |
| 15 Sep 2017 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1411Kristiansand RT 13 + 17 + NRSenior (U13 A)T5946 24909 vs 36487 | Lost −2313-21, 6-21 | 14% | 1155−14.7 |
| 15 Sep 2017 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1357 / Christer Andersen 1390with Mathias Wong 1193Kristiansand RT 13 + 17 + NRSenior (U13 A)T5946 24909+26662 vs 42944+36487 | Lost −2110-21, 11-21 | 5% | 1177−2.6 |
| 4 Mar 2017 | Haakon Lærkerød Jelsness 1316 / Mattis Olsen Berg 1132with Aleksander Jakovlevs 1317Vestre Aker Fjærfest (U13 A)T5925 24909+24980 vs 36487+36501 | Lost −208-21, 14-21 | 66% | 1185−34.2 |