Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Anita Aasebø | Lena Heldal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 3 | 6 |
| Points won | 16747.4% | 18552.6% |
| Average winning margin | 4.0 points | 7.3 points |
| Biggest win | 21-19, 22-20+4 points · 29 Oct 2022 · men's doubles | 21-15, 21-18+9 points · 26 May 2018 · mixed doubles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Lena Heldal won 21-18, 20-22, 21-18 (by 4 points) on 3 Jun 2023.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Anita Aasebø's chance of winning against Lena Heldal. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Anita Aasebø
- 1502 ±304
- #169 · peak 1558
- Lena Heldal
- 1180 ±520
- Not ranked · peak 1275
92% Anita AasebøLena Heldal 8%
Women's doubles
- Anita Aasebø
- 1415 ±175
- #219 · peak 1430
- Lena Heldal
- 1152 ±180
- Not ranked · peak 1275
88% Anita AasebøLena Heldal 12%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Anita Aasebø
- Lena Heldal
Matches against each other
From Anita Aasebø's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2023 | Lena Heldal 1295 / Anders Heldal 1235with Roger Johansen 1373Sotra Strilaslaget 2023 (SEN D)T6665 38673+44548 vs 42914+38552 | Lost −418-21, 22-20, 18-21 | 86% | 1392−3.2 |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Lena Heldal 1306 / Turid Gråberg 1267with Arnt Ole Haukanes 1366Sotra CCBSmashen 2022 (SEN D)T6664 44762+38552 vs 38673+45029 | Won +421-19, 22-20 | 76% | 1354+1.2 |
| 26 May 2018 | Jone Mortensen 1365 / Lena Heldal 1266with Roger Johansen 1202Sotra Strilaslaget 2018 (SEN D)T6009 43876+38673 vs 38552+42914 | Lost −915-21, 18-21 | 48% | 1414−5.4 |
| 13 Jan 2018 | Jone Mortensen 1372 / Lena Heldal 1279with Morten Mortvedt 1264Sotra Sotra Island Cup 2018 (SEN D)T6008 43876+38673 vs 42871+38552 | Lost −916-21, 17-21 | 58% | 1422−6.3 |