Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Marie Gade Brask | Inger Russnes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 2 |
| Sets won | 6 | 4 |
| Points won | 18651.4% | 17648.6% |
| Average winning margin | 12.0 points | 7.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-15, 21-13+14 points · 5 Apr 2019 · women's doubles | 21-17, 15-21, 21-10+9 points · 23 Nov 2018 · women's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Inger Russnes won 21-15, 17-21, 21-18 (by 5 points) on 31 Aug 2019.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Marie Gade Brask's chance of winning against Inger Russnes. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Marie Gade Brask
- 1588 ±357
- Not ranked · peak 1661
- Inger Russnes
- 1063 ±452
- Not ranked · peak 1187
98% Marie Gade BraskInger Russnes 2%
Met 1 time in women's singles: Marie Gade Brask won 1, lost 0.
Winning margins in women's singles
| Measure | Marie Gade Brask | Inger Russnes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 0 |
| Sets won | 2 | 0 |
| Points won | 4256.8% |
Matches against each other
From Marie Gade Brask's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2019 | Inger Russnes 1014Haugerud RT 15 + 19 (U15 A)T6193 43387 vs 43310 | Won +1021-18, 21-14 | 87% | 1276+15.7 |
| 31 Aug 2019 | Emilie Haukebøe 1328 / Inger Russnes 1161with Livia Romme Mørch 1096Haugerud RT 15 + 19 (U15 A)T6193 17417+43310 vs 43388+43387 | Lost −515-21, 21-17, 18-21 | 28% | 1268−4.9 |
| 5 Apr 2019 | Emilie Haukebøe 1338 / Inger Russnes 1172with Selma Kvarenes Bjørnestøl 1481Haugerud UBM (U15 A)T6093 43387+17418 vs 17417+43310 | Won +1421-15, 21-13 | 86% | 1284+14.1 |
| 23 Nov 2018 | Emilie Haukebøe 1279 / Inger Russnes 1095with Livia Romme Mørch 1198Moss RT 15* + NRSenior* (U15 A)T6082 17417+43310 vs 43387+43388 | Lost −917-21, 21-15, 10-21 | 72% | 1278−22.7 |