Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Anita Vabø | Cecilie Mikkelsen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 2 | 7 |
| Points won | 14644.4% | 18355.6% |
| Average winning margin | 4.0 points | 13.7 points |
| Biggest win | 17-21, 21-15, 21-19+4 points · 20 Oct 2018 · women's doubles | 21-11, 21-15+16 points · 20 Oct 2018 · women's singles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Anita Vabø won 17-21, 21-15, 21-19 (by 4 points) on 20 Oct 2018.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Anita Vabø's chance of winning against Cecilie Mikkelsen. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Anita Vabø
- 1096 ±480
- Not ranked · peak 1433
- Cecilie Mikkelsen
- 1569 ±383
- #136 · peak 1591
3% Anita VabøCecilie Mikkelsen 97%
Met 1 time in women's singles: Anita Vabø won 0, lost 1.
Winning margins in women's singles
| Measure | Anita Vabø | Cecilie Mikkelsen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 1 |
| Sets won | 0 | 2 |
| Points won | 2638.2% |
Matches against each other
From Anita Vabø's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2018 | Cecilie Mikkelsen 1303 / Miriam Mikkelsen 1303with Astrid Bognøy 1312Sotra Vestlandsmesterskapet 2018 (SEN C)T6143 44743+44742 vs 17096+43574 | Lost −1020-22, 13-21 | 47% | 1266−11.6 |
| 20 Oct 2018 | Cecilie Mikkelsen 1373Askøy Askøy Duellen 2018 (SEN D)T6150 44743 vs 43574 | Lost −1611-21, 15-21 | 23% | 1199−16.3 |
| 20 Oct 2018 | Cecilie Mikkelsen 1297 / Miriam Mikkelsen 1297with Line Klæbo 1377Askøy Askøy Duellen 2018 (SEN D)T6150 43574+17952 vs 44743+44742 | Won +417-21, 21-15, 21-19 | 61% | 1280+2.2 |
| 26 May 2018 | Miriam Mikkelsen 1279 / Cecilie Mikkelsen 1279with Astrid Bognøy 1274Sotra Strilaslaget 2018 (SEN D)T6009 44742+44743 vs 43574+17096 | Lost −158-21, 20-22 | 43% | 1234−11.9 |