Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Cecilie Welle Bay | Yngvild Buraas |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 2 |
| Sets won | 6 | 5 |
| Points won | 21652.6% | 19547.4% |
| Average winning margin | 9.5 points | 4.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-13, 21-15+14 points · 16 Mar 2024 · women's doubles | 11-21, 21-19, 21-18+5 points · 20 Nov 2022 · women's doubles |
3 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Yngvild Buraas won 21-15, 16-21, 23-21 (by 3 points) on 27 Jan 2024.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Cecilie Welle Bay's chance of winning against Yngvild Buraas. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Cecilie Welle Bay
- 1510 ±359
- Not ranked · peak 1542
- Yngvild Buraas
- 1224 ±243
- #396 · peak 1539
90% Cecilie Welle BayYngvild Buraas 10%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Cecilie Welle Bay
- Yngvild Buraas
Matches against each other
From Cecilie Welle Bay's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Mar 2024 | Yngvild Buraas 1451 / Moana Vadseth Furholm 1503with Ragnhild Stenvaag 15601. Divisjon Midt-Norge Sluttspill 5-7. plass (1. DD)L10620 44209+17614 vs 17984+23534 | Won +1421-13, 21-15 | 62% | 1480+24.6 |
| 27 Jan 2024 | Yngvild Buraas 1447 / Marlen Nygård 1449with Ragnhild Stenvaag 14981. Divisjon Midt-Norge Grunnspill (1. DD)L10638 17984+26665 vs 44209+17614 | Lost −315-21, 21-16, 21-23 | 64% | 1466−5.0 |
| 18 Mar 2023 | Emma Søvik 1363 / Yngvild Buraas 1419with Viktoria Humlen 13361. div Midt-Norge Sluttspill 5-7. plass (1. DD)L10074 17553+44209 vs 22297+17984 | Won +517-21, 21-15, 21-18 | 51% | 1458+5.3 |
| 20 Nov 2022 | Emma Søvik 1384 / Yngvild Buraas 1425with Inger Margrethe Midtlid 15571. div Midt-Norge Grunnspill (1. DD)L9683 44209+22431 vs 22297+17984 | Lost +521-11, 19-21, 18-21 | 81% | 1428−11.7 |