Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir | Oliver Larsen Witsø |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 4 |
| Points won | 12448.4% | 13251.6% |
| Average winning margin | 7.0 points | 7.5 points |
| Biggest win | 21-19, 21-16+7 points · 28 Dec 2022 · mixed doubles | 12-21, 21-7, 21-18+8 points · 12 Nov 2022 · mixed doubles |
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir won 21-19, 21-16 (by 7 points) on 28 Dec 2022.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir's chance of winning against Oliver Larsen Witsø. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Mixed doubles
- Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir
- 1209 ±187
- Not ranked · peak 1309
- Oliver Larsen Witsø
- 1211 ±160
- Not ranked · peak 1487
50% Agnes Søvik GunnarsdottirOliver Larsen Witsø 50%
Met 3 times in mixed doubles: Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir won 1, lost 2.
Winning margins in mixed doubles
| Measure | Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir | Oliver Larsen Witsø |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 4 |
| Points won |
Matches against each other
From Agnes Søvik Gunnarsdottir's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Dec 2022 | Oliver Larsen Witsø 1410 / Sigrid Jonette Varga 1356with Julian Hjelle Sæter 1216Norborg Romjulsturnering (U15 A)T6623 44260+46842 vs 46843+47345 | Won +721-19, 21-16 | 10% | 1272+14.7 |
| 12 Nov 2022 | Mia Henriksen 1047 / Oliver Larsen Witsø 1383with Julian Hjelle Sæter 1228Norborg NorborgCupen 2022 (U15 A)T6622 43163+46843 vs 44260+46842 | Lost −821-12, 7-21, 18-21 | 57% | 1231−8.4 |
| 26 Mar 2022 | Karen Uggedal Søvik 1177 / Oliver Larsen Witsø 1357with Are Kjeseth 1158Ålesund Ålesundsvippen 2022 (U17 B)T6514 43330+46843 vs 44260+46787 | Lost −716-21, 20-22 | 27% | 1245−2.0 |