Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 5 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Eirik Ekerhovd | Lars Lauvik |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 4 | 1 |
| Sets won | 9 | 3 |
| Points won | 22853.9% | 19546.1% |
| Average winning margin | 11.3 points | 10.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-5, 21-12+25 points · 16 Feb 2019 · men's doubles | 17-21, 21-12, 21-16+10 points · 17 Feb 2018 · men's singles |
2 of 5 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Eirik Ekerhovd won 21-19, 11-21, 21-14 (by 1 point) on 15 Feb 2020.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Eirik Ekerhovd's chance of winning against Lars Lauvik. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Eirik Ekerhovd
- 1391 ±260
- Not ranked · peak 1509
- Lars Lauvik
- 1195 ±368
- Not ranked · peak 1317
82% Eirik EkerhovdLars Lauvik 18%
Met 4 times in men's singles: Eirik Ekerhovd won 3, lost 1.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Eirik Ekerhovd | Lars Lauvik |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 3 | 1 |
| Sets won | 7 | 3 |
| Points won | 18651.1% | 178 |
Matches against each other
From Eirik Ekerhovd's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Feb 2020 | Lars Lauvik 1165Djerv Møllarslaget 2020 (SEN C)T6267 44541 vs 43669 | Won −121-19, 11-21, 21-14 | 84% | 1378+1.3 |
| 18 Jan 2020 | Lars Lauvik 1122Askøy Askøy Open / KM (SEN C)T6269 44541 vs 43669 | Won +921-16, 21-17 | 73% | 1265+14.6 |
| 25 May 2019 | Lars Lauvik 1274Sotra Strilaslaget 2019 (SEN D)T6145 44541 vs 43669 | Won +1021-18, 21-14 | 52% | 1305+18.7 |
| 16 Feb 2019 | Lars Lauvik 1180 / Sander Andersen Moe 1270with Morten Solsvik 1379Djerv Møllarslaget 2019 (SEN D)T6095 45269+44541 vs 43669+30076 | Won +2521-5, 21-12 | 87% | 1324+8.0 |
| 17 Feb 2018 | Lars Lauvik 1162Djerv Møllarslaget 2018 (SEN D)T5992 43669 vs 44541 | Lost −1021-17, 12-21, 16-21 | 76% | 1290−19.9 |