Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Minelli Marrin Mervin | Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 0 | 6 |
| Points won | 7938.3% | 12761.7% |
| Average winning margin | – | 16.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-9, 21-7+26 points · 14 Mar 2025 · mixed doubles |
0 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug won 21-18, 21-14 (by 10 points) on 28 Sep 2024.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Minelli Marrin Mervin's chance of winning against Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Mixed doubles
- Minelli Marrin Mervin
- 1504 ±147
- #123 among women · peak 1540
- Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug
- 1451 ±153
- #273 among men · peak 1502
60% Minelli Marrin MervinHenrik Frende Lavik-Haug 40%
Met 3 times in mixed doubles: Minelli Marrin Mervin won 0, lost 3.
Winning margins in mixed doubles
| Measure | Minelli Marrin Mervin | Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 0 | 6 |
| Points won |
Matches against each other
From Minelli Marrin Mervin's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Apr 2025 | Hannah Wong 1498 / Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug 1473with Filip Isdahl-Larsen 1428Haugerud NM Junior (U19 A)T6831 45833+44141 vs 45429+45425 | Lost −1211-21, 20-22 | 36% | 1452−13.9 |
| 14 Mar 2025 | Hedda Berg Angell 1514 / Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug 1438with Arne Loen Bue 1016Sotra Sparebanken Vest Norway Open 2025 RT 13ABC + 15ABC + 17ABC + 19ABC og Regional U11ABC (U19 A)T6828 29869+44141 vs 43376+45425 | Lost −269-21, 7-21 | 2% | 1425−2.0 |
| 28 Sep 2024 | Varshini Manikandan 1567 / Henrik Frende Lavik-Haug 1465with Gabriel Pettersen Engelberg 1327Moss Mossetreffen 2024 (SEN A)T6900 44869+44141 vs 46655+45425 | Lost −1018-21, 14-21 | 17% | 1496−6.8 |