Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Filip Isdahl-Larsen | Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 1 | 8 |
| Points won | 14343.6% | 18556.4% |
| Average winning margin | – | 10.5 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-11, 21-17+14 points · 2 Mar 2024 · men's singles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug won 21-16, 22-20 (by 7 points) on 12 Mar 2022.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Filip Isdahl-Larsen's chance of winning against Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Filip Isdahl-Larsen
- 1695 ±148
- #176 · peak 1778
- Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug
- 1290 ±239
- #731 · peak 1534
96% Filip Isdahl-LarsenAndreas Bjønness-Enghaug 4%
Met 3 times in men's singles: Filip Isdahl-Larsen won 0, lost 3.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Filip Isdahl-Larsen | Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 0 | 6 |
| Points won | 96 |
Matches against each other
From Filip Isdahl-Larsen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Feb 2025 | Måns Anders Lund Mabäcker 1551 / Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug 1351with Vinit Sharma 1456Junior NM for lag Mellomspill 3 (1. HD)L12828 45429+43502 vs 44963+47261 | Lost −1111-21, 21-16, 15-21 | 47% | 1407−24.5 |
| 2 Mar 2024 | Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug 1516Sandefjord Sandefjord Open 2024 (U17 A)T6717 47261 vs 45429 | Lost −1411-21, 17-21 | 3% | 1077−4.9 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug 1105Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (U15 C)T6511 47261 vs 45429 | Lost −716-21, 20-22 | 51% | 1108−2.7 |
| 11 Feb 2022 | Andreas Bjønness-Enghaug 1080Oppegård IL KM Oslofjorden/Follosmashen (U15 C)T6515 47261 vs 45429 | Lost −1017-21, 15-21 | 54% | 1097−4.3 |