Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Karl William Hanssen | Elias Gilhay |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 1 | 8 |
| Points won | 14042.0% | 19358.0% |
| Average winning margin | – | 13.3 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-12, 21-7+23 points · 13 Nov 2021 · men's doubles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Elias Gilhay won 22-24, 21-18, 24-22 (by 3 points) on 28 Feb 2020.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Karl William Hanssen's chance of winning against Elias Gilhay. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Karl William Hanssen
- 1010 ±359
- Not ranked · peak 1050
- Elias Gilhay
- 1211 ±353
- Not ranked · peak 1211
18% Karl William HanssenElias Gilhay 82%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Karl William Hanssen
- Elias Gilhay
Men's doubles
- Karl William Hanssen
- 1176 ±228
Matches against each other
From Karl William Hanssen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Mar 2022 | Elias Gilhay 1193 / Ludvig Kolberg 1351with Benjamin Brevik 1312Grong Namdal Open 2022 (U13 A)T6504 46169+43402 vs 44654+46433 | Lost −1610-21, 16-21 | 42% | 1172−17.9 |
| 4 Mar 2022 | Elias Gilhay 1166 / Alva Karoline Sandøy Bredrup 1221with Tora Maurstad Pettersen 1137Grong Namdal Open 2022 (U13 A)T6504 46169+45559 vs 44406+46433 | Lost −1113-21, 18-21 | 42% | 1196−11.3 |
| 13 Nov 2021 | Anton Einarsen Fiskum 1221 / Elias Gilhay 1131with Marco Gran Bustadmo 1125Grong Tommy Gåsbakks minneturnering 2021 (U13 B)T6505 46434+46169 vs 46433+47161 | Lost −2312-21, 7-21 | 46% | 1198−9.5 |
| 28 Feb 2020 | Elias Gilhay 1130 / Tengel Melhus Tømmerås 1221with Anton Einarsen Fiskum 1221Grong Namdal Open 2020 (U11 B)T6277 46169+46230 vs 46434+46433 | Lost −324-22, 18-21, 22-24 | 65% | 1208−0.4 |