Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
2–2
4 matches against each other
Together: 5 won, 13 lost
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Eram Jafer Ali Hassen | Tingyu Zhang |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 2 |
| Sets won | 6 | 5 |
| Points won | 19248.0% | 20852.0% |
| Average winning margin | 6.5 points | 11.5 points |
| Biggest win | 23-21, 21-13+10 points · 5 Jan 2024 · men's doubles | 21-13, 19-21, 21-9+18 points · 16 Dec 2023 · men's singles |
3 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Eram Jafer Ali Hassen won 12-21, 21-16, 21-20 (by 3 points) on 3 Jun 2023.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Eram Jafer Ali Hassen's chance of winning against Tingyu Zhang. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Met 3 times in men's singles: Eram Jafer Ali Hassen won 1, lost 2.
| Measure | Eram Jafer Ali Hassen | Tingyu Zhang |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 4 | 5 |
| Points won | 14846.0% |
From Eram Jafer Ali Hassen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Jan 2024 | Patrik Toftevåg-nesset 1263 / Tingyu Zhang 1274with Johannes Tobiassen 1377Bergen RT U15* + Sen* (SEN E)T6694 45671+46753 vs 45669+47211 | Won +1023-21, 21-13 | 65% | 1259+17.0 |
| 16 Dec 2023 | Tingyu Zhang 1544Djerv Djerv Møllarslaget 2023 (SEN A)T6804 47211 vs 46753 | Lost −1813-21, 21-19, 9-21 | 36% | 1431−35.4 |
| 3 Jun 2023 | Tingyu Zhang 1612Sotra Strilaslaget 2023 (U17 A)T6665 46753 vs 47211 | Won −312-21, 21-16, 21-20 | 23% | 1466+11.0 |
| 4 Feb 2023 | Tingyu Zhang 1191Bergen Fana Cup 2023 (U17 A)T6635 47211 vs 46753 | Lost −521-14, 16-21, 14-21 | 76% | 1318−21.9 |
From Eram Jafer Ali Hassen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Feb 2025 | Kenneth salvadhoor 1613 / Gabriel Pettersen Engelberg 1408with Tingyu Zhang 1354Junior NM for lag Mellomspill 3 (1. HD)L12827 46086+46655 vs 46753+47211 | Lost15-21, 11-21 | 4% | 1253−9.2 |
| 3 Jun 2023 | Heine Lam Nybakk 1496 / Sondre Lie Foldnes 1510with Tingyu Zhang 1278Sotra Strilaslaget 2023 (SEN E)T6665 43887+42915 vs 46753+47211 | Lost7-21, 16-21 | 3% | 1261−2.8 |
| 3 Jun 2023 | Johannes Tobiassen 1398 / Patrik Toftevåg-nesset 1270with Tingyu Zhang 1281Sotra Strilaslaget 2023 (SEN E)T6665 45671+45669 vs 46753+47211 | Lost21-13, 16-21, 17-21 | 28% | 1264−1.9 |
| 14 Apr 2023 | Ole Kristian Lie 1597 / Sindre Gjuvsland 1396with Tingyu Zhang 1282Haugerud UBM (U17 A)T6584 43576+42948 vs 46753+47211 | Lost12-21, 17-21 | 3% | 1250−1.7 |
| 14 Apr 2023 | Fredrik Heiberg 1331 / Mikkel Grevsnes 1346with Tingyu Zhang 1340Haugerud UBM (U17 A)T6584 44665+18422 vs 46753+47211 | Lost16-21, 12-21 | 44% | 1252−54.0 |
| 4 Feb 2023 | Shreyan Reddy Korem 1387 / Albert Aasheim-Engen 1496with Tingyu Zhang 1311Bergen Fana Cup 2023 (U17 A)T6635 43937+38640 vs 47211+46753 | Lost17-21, 9-21 | 11% | 1287−7.8 |
| 4 Feb 2023 | Patrik Toftevåg-nesset 1248 / Johannes Tobiassen 1229with Tingyu Zhang 1316Bergen Fana Cup 2023 (U17 A)T6635 45669+45671 vs 47211+46753 | Lost17-21, 21-15, 20-22 | 74% | 1295−4.6 |
| 4 Feb 2023 | Simon Andrés Vasquez Frisnes 1337 / Fabian Nelson 1363with Tingyu Zhang 1271Bergen Fana Cup 2023 (U17 A)T6635 47211+46753 vs 44555+43938 | Won21-12, 21-18 | 21% | 1300+41.6 |
| 10 Dec 2022 | Åsmund Sundal-Gjerdevik 1295 / Herman Kolstø 1382with Tingyu Zhang 1318Bergen Julecupen 2022 (U17 A)T6633 45805+42794 vs 47211+46753 | Lost17-21, 12-21 | 39% | 1258−44.0 |
| 10 Dec 2022 | Patrik Toftevåg-nesset 1266 / Johannes Tobiassen 1248with Tingyu Zhang 1307Bergen Julecupen 2022 (U17 A)T6633 47211+46753 vs 45669+45671 | Won21-10, 13-21, 21-14 | 66% | 1303+10.5 |
| 10 Dec 2022 | Pranav Tehlan 1439 / Adrian Helle Ekerhovd 1325with Tingyu Zhang 1327Bergen Julecupen 2022 (U17 A)T6633 42998+44426 vs 47211+46753 | Lost16-21, 11-21 | 27% | 1292−17.8 |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Oline Langeland Risa 1281 / Juli Helen Johansen Klungtveit 1300with Tingyu Zhang 1331Sotra CCBSmashen 2022 (U17 A)T6664 43577+44277 vs 47211+46753 | Lost17-21, 21-15, 18-21 | 62% | 1309−3.7 |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Martin Våge Sætersdal 1146 / Arathija Anton Reginold 1165with Tingyu Zhang 1328Sotra CCBSmashen 2022 (U17 A)T6664 47211+46753 vs 44677+36519 | Won21-19, 21-15 | 93% | 1313+2.3 |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Simon Andrés Vasquez Frisnes 1387 / Fabian Nelson 1412with Tingyu Zhang 1330Sotra CCBSmashen 2022 (U17 A)T6664 44555+43938 vs 47211+46753 | Lost21-16, 19-21, 15-21 | 23% | 1311−1.8 |
| 29 Oct 2022 | Thomas Lam Nybakk 1372 / Håvard Lie Foldnes 1254with Tingyu Zhang 1287Sotra CCBSmashen 2022 (U17 A)T6664 47211+46753 vs 44422+43003 | Won21-14, 21-14 | 38% | 1312+37.4 |
| 1 Oct 2022 | Sindre Gjuvsland 1441 / Ole Kristian Lie 1579with Tingyu Zhang 1297Djerv Høsttreff Djerv (U17 A)T6634 42948+43576 vs 47211+46753 | Lost5-21, 14-21 | 3% | 1276−3.5 |
| 1 Oct 2022 | Patrik Toftevåg-nesset 1237 / Johannes Tobiassen 1218with Tingyu Zhang 1288Djerv Høsttreff Djerv (U17 A)T6634 47211+46753 vs 45669+45671 | Won21-16, 17-21, 21-13 | 69% | 1278+7.4 |
| 1 Oct 2022 | Pranav Tehlan 1386 / Adrian Helle Ekerhovd 1365with Tingyu Zhang 1296Djerv Høsttreff Djerv (U17 A)T6634 42998+44426 vs 47211+46753 | Lost15-21, 20-22 | 20% | 1271−6.0 |
| 17454.0% |
| Average winning margin | 3.0 points | 11.5 points |
|---|
| Biggest win | 12-21, 21-16, 21-20+3 points · 3 Jun 2023 | 21-13, 19-21, 21-9+18 points · 16 Dec 2023 |
|---|
3 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Eram Jafer Ali Hassen won 12-21, 21-16, 21-20 (by 3 points) on 3 Jun 2023.
Rating at the end of each week
Met 1 time in men's doubles: Eram Jafer Ali Hassen won 1, lost 0.
| Measure | Eram Jafer Ali Hassen | Tingyu Zhang |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 0 |
| Sets won | 2 | 0 |
| Points won | 4456.4% | 3443.6% |
| Average winning margin | 10.0 points | – |
| Biggest win | 23-21, 21-13+10 points · 5 Jan 2024 | – |
0 of 1 match went to a deciding set. Closest: Eram Jafer Ali Hassen won 23-21, 21-13 (by 10 points) on 5 Jan 2024.
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week