Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Ulrick Edner Høilund | Qianyang Gan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 4 |
| Points won | 12548.4% | 13351.6% |
| Average winning margin | 9.0 points | 8.5 points |
| Biggest win | 21-19, 21-14+9 points · 5 Mar 2022 · men's doubles | 22-20, 21-9+14 points · 16 Oct 2021 · men's doubles |
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Qianyang Gan won 21-14, 15-21, 21-19 (by 3 points) on 26 Mar 2022.
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Ulrick Edner Høilund's chance of winning against Qianyang Gan. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Rating at the end of each week
From Ulrick Edner Høilund's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Mar 2022 | Gard Løkensgard Sørensen 1200 / Qianyang Gan 1173with Bryan Javier Matland 1082Frogner Frognerkyllingen (U15 B)T6479 45314+44239 vs 46849+46795 | Lost −314-21, 21-15, 19-21 | 38% | 1228−0.6 |
| 5 Mar 2022 | Qianyang Gan 1167 / Ole Ramberg Singler 1266with Bryan Javier Matland 1069Vestre Aker Fjærfest (U15 B)T6553 46795+46849 vs 44239+46727 | Won +921-19, 21-14 | 24% | 1219+5.9 |
| 16 Oct 2021 | Qianyang Gan 1149 / Gard Løkensgard Sørensen 1191with Bryan Javier Matland 1050Bygdø Bygdø Høsttreff 2021 (U15 B)T6519 44239+45314 vs 46795+46849 | Lost −1420-22, 9-21 | 35% | 1203−4.6 |
Met 3 times in men's doubles: Ulrick Edner Høilund won 1, lost 2.
| Measure | Ulrick Edner Høilund | Qianyang Gan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 2 |
| Sets won | 3 | 4 |
| Points won | 12548.4% | 13351.6% |
| Average winning margin | 9.0 points | 8.5 points |
| Biggest win | 21-19, 21-14+9 points · 5 Mar 2022 | 22-20, 21-9+14 points · 16 Oct 2021 |
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Qianyang Gan won 21-14, 15-21, 21-19 (by 3 points) on 26 Mar 2022.
Rating at the end of each week
Rating at the end of each week