Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Anton Hofmann | Anowarul Habib |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 3 | 1 |
| Sets won | 6 | 4 |
| Points won | 18950.3% | 18749.7% |
| Average winning margin | 4.3 points | 11.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-19, 21-17+6 points · 8 Feb 2025 · men's doubles | 21-19, 21-12+11 points · 20 Jan 2024 · men's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Anton Hofmann won 21-15, 15-21, 21-18 (by 3 points) on 12 Apr 2025.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Anton Hofmann's chance of winning against Anowarul Habib. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Anton Hofmann
- 1826 ±136
- #112 · peak 1947
- Anowarul Habib
- 1142 ±244
- #1112 · peak 1427
99% Anton HofmannAnowarul Habib 1%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Anton Hofmann
- Anowarul Habib
Men's doubles
- Anton Hofmann
- 1531 ±99
- #268 · peak 1614
Matches against each other
From Anton Hofmann's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Apr 2025 | Bilal Afzal 1444 / Anowarul Habib 1346with Tobias h Mathiesen 1460Tromsøstudentenes IL TSI PåskeSmash (SEN E)T6968.2 49156+46886 vs 48730+48728 | Won +321-15, 15-21, 21-18 | 82% | 1529+0.9 |
| 12 Apr 2025 | Bilal Afzal 1446 / Anowarul Habib 1348with Tobias h Mathiesen 1471Tromsøstudentenes IL TSI PåskeSmash (SEN E)T6968 49156+46886 vs 48730+48728 | Won +421-17, 17-21, 21-17 | 84% | 1535+1.0 |
| 8 Feb 2025 | Md Emranul Haque 1357 / Anowarul Habib 1354with Tobias h Mathiesen 1361Tromsø Arctic Open (SEN A)T6841 49156+46886 vs 50139+48728 | Won +621-19, 21-17 | 83% | 1555+2.2 |
| 20 Jan 2024 | Bilal Afzal 1336 / Anowarul Habib 1346with Einar Brinck Hansen 1367Tromsø KM Hålogaland badmintonkrets/Tromsø Open (SEN C)T6793 48730+48728 vs 48681+46886 | Lost −1119-21, 12-21 | 78% | 1469−9.0 |