Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Jacob Bakken Hasle | Louise Reme |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 2 | 6 |
| Points won | 12847.6% | 14152.4% |
| Average winning margin | 28.0 points | 13.7 points |
| Biggest win | 21-9, 21-5+28 points · 4 Nov 2023 · men's singles | 21-11, 21-6+25 points · 2 Dec 2023 · mixed doubles |
0 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Louise Reme won 21-18, 22-20 (by 5 points) on 4 Nov 2023.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Jacob Bakken Hasle's chance of winning against Louise Reme. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Jacob Bakken Hasle
- 1047 ±318
- Not ranked · peak 1055
- Louise Reme
- 1011 ±296
- Not ranked · peak 1125
57% Jacob Bakken HasleLouise Reme 43%
Met 1 time in men's singles: Jacob Bakken Hasle won 1, lost 0.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Jacob Bakken Hasle | Louise Reme |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 0 |
| Sets won | 2 | 0 |
| Points won | 4275.0% |
Matches against each other
From Jacob Bakken Hasle's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec 2023 | Louise Reme 1223 / Daniel Hansen 1283with Evelin Abusdal 1137Kristiansand Pizzabaker-cup (U11 A)T6745 48864+46718 vs 47608+47308 | Lost −2511-21, 6-21 | 21% | 1191−6.1 |
| 4 Nov 2023 | Louise Reme 1049Imås IL McDonald`s Cup høst 2023 (U11 A)T6810 47308 vs 48864 | Won +2821-9, 21-5 | 45% | 1055+33.0 |
| 4 Nov 2023 | Ivo Ekelund Formoe 1155 / Louise Reme 1221with Evelin Abusdal 1138Imås IL McDonald`s Cup høst 2023 (U11 A)T6810 47609+48864 vs 47608+47308 | Lost −518-21, 20-22 | 43% | 1197−1.8 |
| 25 Mar 2023 | Louise Reme 1219 / Mateusz Losinski 1243with Lilly Haugen 1224Kristiansand Spareskillingsbanken-cup (U11 B)T6621 48864+48509 vs 47308+48863 | Lost −1115-21, 16-21 | 43% | 1199−1.8 |