Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Nichlas Brevik | Ida Amalie Skårn |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 3 | 6 |
| Points won | 15947.9% | 17352.1% |
| Average winning margin | 15.0 points | 9.7 points |
| Biggest win | 21-12, 21-15+15 points · 24 Mar 2023 · mixed doubles | 21-8, 21-15+19 points · 28 Dec 2022 · men's doubles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Ida Amalie Skårn won 22-20, 26-24 (by 4 points) on 11 Nov 2023.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Nichlas Brevik's chance of winning against Ida Amalie Skårn. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Nichlas Brevik
- 1257 ±163
- #807 · peak 1447
- Ida Amalie Skårn
- 1258 ±286
- Not ranked · peak 1322
50% Nichlas BrevikIda Amalie Skårn 50%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Nichlas Brevik
- Ida Amalie Skårn
Men's doubles
- Nichlas Brevik
Matches against each other
From Nichlas Brevik's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2023 | Ida Amalie Skårn 1238 / Lukas Wüstefeld 1291with Ronja Michelle Pettersen 1176Grong Tommy Gåsbakks minneturnering (U11 A)T6734 47767+49437 vs 46846+47313 | Lost −420-22, 24-26 | 39% | 1295−0.7 |
| 29 Apr 2023 | Ida Amalie Skårn 1259 / Mio Sebastian Sygard Johnsgård 1252with Alde Andrea Rohde Hallager 1196Orkanger Orkla Cup (U11 A)T6643 47767+48278 vs 47313+47080 | Lost −621-14, 12-21, 17-21 | 45% | 1287−1.5 |
| 24 Mar 2023 | Ida Amalie Skårn 1264 / Linus Johan Johansen 1227with Alde Andrea Rohde Hallager 1190Nesna Nesnasmashen 2022 (U11 A)T6705 47313+47080 vs 47767+47469 | Won +1521-12, 21-15 | 46% | 1286+7.2 |
| 28 Dec 2022 | Ida Amalie Skårn 1241 / Nora Langen 1051with Nathan Gilay 1236Grong Blodslitet (U11 A)T6615 47767+46412 vs 48396+47313 | Lost −198-21, 15-21 | 84% | 1260−13.2 |