Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Bharath Kumar Pachappan | Sindre Gjuvsland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 1 | 3 |
| Sets won | 3 | 7 |
| Points won | 17846.6% | 20453.4% |
| Average winning margin | 3.0 points | 9.7 points |
| Biggest win | 21-16, 17-21, 21-19+3 points · 3 Jun 2023 · men's doubles | 21-11, 21-12+19 points · 7 Sep 2024 · men's doubles |
2 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Bharath Kumar Pachappan won 21-16, 17-21, 21-19 (by 3 points) on 3 Jun 2023.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Bharath Kumar Pachappan's chance of winning against Sindre Gjuvsland. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Bharath Kumar Pachappan
- 1372 ±281
- Not ranked · peak 1562
- Sindre Gjuvsland
- 1844 ±186
- #102 · peak 1912
3% Bharath Kumar PachappanSindre Gjuvsland 97%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Bharath Kumar Pachappan
- Sindre Gjuvsland
Matches against each other
From Bharath Kumar Pachappan's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Nov 2024 | Heine Lam Nybakk 1526 / Sindre Gjuvsland 1692with Martin Feussner 1540Sotra Bigbite Strilaslaget 2024 (SEN A)T6861 43887+42948 vs 48651+47644 | Lost −524-22, 18-21, 17-21 | 15% | 1454−2.2 |
| 7 Sep 2024 | Sindre Gjuvsland 1665 / Heine Lam Nybakk 1437with Martin Feussner 1529Djerv Djerv Høsttreff 2024 (SEN A)T6856 42948+43887 vs 48651+47644 | Lost −1911-21, 12-21 | 32% | 1446−29.4 |
| 3 Jun 2023 | Sindre Gjuvsland 1421 / Morten Straume 1494with Martin Feussner 1604Sotra Strilaslaget 2023 (SEN E)T6665 48651+47644 vs 42948+21852 | Won +321-16, 17-21, 21-19 | 69% | 1420+2.1 |
| 3 Sep 2022 | Ole Kristian Lie 1583 / Sindre Gjuvsland 1446with Kumaran Dhakshan Moorthy 1600Askøy Åpnings Cup (SEN A)T6639 43576+42948 vs 19641+47644 | Lost −519-21, 18-21 | 54% | 1438−13.9 |