Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Helge Skogmo Berg | Ronja Michelle Pettersen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 2 | 6 |
| Points won | 13646.4% | 15753.6% |
| Average winning margin | – | 7.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-15, 21-15+12 points · 10 Oct 2025 · mixed doubles |
2 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Ronja Michelle Pettersen won 21-13, 15-21, 21-19 (by 4 points) on 7 Feb 2026.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Helge Skogmo Berg's chance of winning against Ronja Michelle Pettersen. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Helge Skogmo Berg
- 751 ±219
- #1927 · peak 1125
- Ronja Michelle Pettersen
- 1011 ±365
- Not ranked · peak 1055
12% Helge Skogmo BergRonja Michelle Pettersen 88%
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week
- Helge Skogmo Berg
- Ronja Michelle Pettersen
Men's doubles
- Helge Skogmo Berg
- 1285 ±154
- #1147 · peak 1350
- Ronja Michelle Pettersen
- 1222 ±199
- Not ranked · peak 1237
62% Helge Skogmo BergRonja Michelle Pettersen 38%
Matches against each other
From Helge Skogmo Berg's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Feb 2026 | Loke Mathiassen Nilsen 1115 / Ronja Michelle Pettersen 1197with Miriam Vidal Betrian 1150Grong Namdal Open 2026 (U13 A)T7016 50646+46846 vs 51437+50796 | Lost −521-16, 15-21, 17-21 | 55% | 1183−3.9 |
| 7 Feb 2026 | Ronja Michelle Pettersen 1176 / Loke Mathiassen Nilsen 1082with Tana Olivia Pettersen 1302Herøy Herøycup 2026 (U13 B)T7011 46846+50646 vs 50631+50796 | Lost −413-21, 21-15, 19-21 | 85% | 1181−1.3 |
| 10 Oct 2025 | Ronja Michelle Pettersen 1206 / Loke Mathiassen Nilsen 1137with Iben Marie Kaspersen Krogstad 978Gullvikmoen Rockesmashen 2025 (U13 A)T7000 46846+50646 vs 47723+50796 | Lost −1215-21, 15-21 | 24% | 1209−7.1 |