Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 3 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Nuchpavee Banwanit | Catrine Havre Økland |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 2 | 1 |
| Sets won | 4 | 3 |
| Points won | 13352.4% | 12147.6% |
| Average winning margin | 9.5 points | 7.0 points |
| Biggest win | 21-17, 21-11+14 points · 8 Nov 2025 · women's doubles | 21-17, 21-18+7 points · 18 Oct 2025 · women's doubles |
1 of 3 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Nuchpavee Banwanit won 21-17, 14-21, 21-13 (by 5 points) on 17 Jan 2026.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Nuchpavee Banwanit's chance of winning against Catrine Havre Økland. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Nuchpavee Banwanit
- 1204 ±246
- #418 · peak 1321
- Catrine Havre Økland
- 1172 ±425
- Not ranked · peak 1275
56% Nuchpavee BanwanitCatrine Havre Økland 44%
Women's doubles
- Nuchpavee Banwanit
- 1283 ±145
- #454 · peak 1313
- Catrine Havre Økland
- 1263 ±155
- #495 · peak 1350
54% Nuchpavee BanwanitCatrine Havre Økland 46%
Met 3 times in women's doubles: Nuchpavee Banwanit won 2, lost 1.
Winning margins in women's doubles
Matches against each other
From Nuchpavee Banwanit's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jan 2026 | Catrine Havre Økland 1267 / Ingvild Skaar 1065with Nuntipat Banwanit 1268Askøy Kretsmesterskap Krets Vest / Askøy Open (SEN D)T7012 50095+51235 vs 49129+50483 | Won +521-17, 14-21, 21-13 | 79% | 1237+1.6 |
| 8 Nov 2025 | Catrine Havre Økland 1250 / Ingvild Skaar 1038with Nuntipat Banwanit 1258Sotra Vestlandsmesterskapet 2025 (SEN D)T7022 50095+51235 vs 49129+50483 | Won +1421-17, 21-11 | 82% | 1230+5.9 |
| 18 Oct 2025 | Ingvild Skaar 1027 / Catrine Havre Økland 1246with Nuntipat Banwanit 1294BSI BSI-Smashen (SEN D)T7059 50483+49129 vs 50095+51235 | Lost −717-21, 18-21 | 90% | 1253−13.0 |