Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rating by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | 1630 | 1605 |
| 2017/2018 | 1615 | 1592 |
| 2018/2019 | 1591 | 1573 |
| 2019/2020 | 1577 | 1562 |
| 2020/2021 | 1571 | 1557 |
| 2021/2022 | 1558 | 1547 |
| 2022/2023 | 1546 | 1537 |
| 2023/2024 | 1537 | 1530 |
| 2024/2025 | 1529 | 1523 |
| 2025/2026 | 1523 | 1519 |
| 2026/2027 | 1522 | 1517 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | #183 of 1,742 | #111 of 1,729 |
| 2017/2018 | – | – |
| 2018/2019 | – | – |
| 2019/2020 | – | – |
| 2020/2021 | – | – |
| 2021/2022 | – | – |
| 2022/2023 | – | – |
| 2023/2024 | – | – |
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1522 ±520
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1631
- Matches
- 4
- 4 won · 0 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, December 2016 to December 2016
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | Trondheim | 1630 |
| 2017/2018 | Trondheim | 1615 |
| 2018/2019 | Trondheim | 1591 |
| 2019/2020 | Trondheim | 1577 |
| 2020/2021 | Trondheim | 1571 |
| 2021/2022 | Trondheim | 1558 |
| 2022/2023 | Trondheim | 1546 |
| 2023/2024 | Trondheim | 1537 |
| 2024/2025 | Trondheim | 1529 |
| 2025/2026 | Trondheim |