Loading player…
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Women's doubles |
|---|---|
| 2015/2016 | #156 of 635 |
| 2016/2017 | #167 of 695 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2016 | Emilie Faarup Storvik 1709 / Emilie Sotnes Hamang 1717with Synne Lund 1691Bygdø NM 2016 (SEN E)T729 21027+20814 vs 38581+18916 | Lost7-21, 7-21 | 14% | 1444−57.5 |
| 5 Feb 2016 | Rakel Gundersen 1238 / Nora Jansson 1358with Synne Lund 1691Bygdø NM 2016 (SEN E)T729 38581+18916 vs 22782+21754 | Won21-19, 21-13 | 99% | 1501+1.1 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2016 | Rakel Gundersen 1238 / Nora Jansson 1358with Synne Lund 1691Bygdø NM 2016 (SEN E)T729 38581+18916 vs 22782+21754 | Won21-19, 21-13 | 99% | 1501+1.1 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2016 | Emilie Faarup Storvik 1709 / Emilie Sotnes Hamang 1717with Synne Lund 1691Bygdø NM 2016 (SEN E)T729 21027+20814 vs 38581+18916 | Lost7-21, 7-21 | 14% | 1444−57.5 |