Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rating by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | 1173 | 1230 |
| 2017/2018 | 1173 | 1261 |
| 2018/2019 | – | 1261 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | #932 of 1,742 | #1248 of 1,729 |
| 2017/2018 | #947 of 1,879 | #1078 of 1,785 |
| 2018/2019 | – | #1079 of 1,801 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1173 ±520
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1330
- Matches
- 5
- 1 won · 4 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, October 2016 to March 2017
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | NTNUI | 1173 |
| 2017/2018 | NTNUI | 1173 |
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Mar 2017 | Adrian Bruaset 1412NTNUI NTNUI Open 2017 (SEN C)T5895 25307 vs 43104 | Lost5-21, 8-21 | 18% | 1173−43.7 |
| 3 Mar 2017 | Henrik Hvidsten 1359NTNUI NTNUI Open 2017 (SEN C)T5895 19672 vs 43104 | Lost12-21, 6-21 | 35% | 1217−60.9 |
| 3 Mar 2017 | Ragnar Bråstein 1044NTNUI NTNUI Open 2017 (SEN C)T5895 26721 vs 43104 | Lost14-21, 22-20, 11-21 | 90% | 1278−51.7 |
| 7 Oct 2016 | Martin Kvalheim 1264NTNUI NTNUI Treffpunkt 2016 (SEN D)T5894 43104 vs 43095 | Won21-7, 21-8 | 49% | 1329+71.3 |
| 7 Oct 2016 | Mingshu Shi 1286NTNUI NTNUI Treffpunkt 2016 (SEN D)T5894 43099 vs 43104 | Lost16-21, 17-21 | 48% | 1258−16.7 |