Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
| Season | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | 1631 | 1686 |
| 2017/2018 | 1613 | 1661 |
| 2018/2019 | 1590 | 1627 |
| 2019/2020 | 1576 | 1608 |
| 2020/2021 | 1570 | 1599 |
| 2021/2022 | 1558 | 1582 |
| 2022/2023 | 1546 | 1565 |
| 2023/2024 | 1536 | 1551 |
| 2024/2025 | 1529 | 1541 |
| 2025/2026 | 1523 | 1532 |
| 2026/2027 | 1521 | 1530 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles (among women) |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | #55 of 666 | #30 of 607 |
| 2017/2018 | – | – |
| 2018/2019 | – | – |
| 2019/2020 | – | – |
| 2020/2021 | – | – |
| 2021/2022 | – | – |
| 2022/2023 | – | – |
| 2023/2024 |
Rating at the end of each week, November 2016 to November 2016
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | India | 1631 |
| 2017/2018 | India | 1613 |
| 2018/2019 | India | 1590 |
| 2019/2020 | India | 1576 |
| 2020/2021 | India | 1570 |
| 2021/2022 | India | 1558 |
| 2022/2023 | India | 1546 |
| 2023/2024 | India | 1536 |
| 2024/2025 | India | 1529 |
| 2025/2026 | India | 1523 |
| – |
| – |
| 2024/2025 | – | – |
| 2025/2026 | – | – |
| 2026/2027 | – | – |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
| 2026/2027 | India | 1521 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Sonja Wåland 1844 / Marlene Wåland 1699with Lee Zhi Qing 1639Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 18758+20617 vs 43278+43275 | Lost10-21, 11-21 | 12% | 1631−7.8 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Linn Lilian Stenrud 1778 / Marthe Skaug 1731with Lee Zhi Qing 1616Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 19874+20093 | Won21-16, 21-17 | 11% | 1639+22.9 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Thea Johansen 1728 / Helene Abusdal 1830with Lee Zhi Qing 1571Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 19879+21042 | Won21-19, 21-9 | 4% | 1616+45.0 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Ida Høyland W. 1703 / Henny Lyfjell 1714with Lee Zhi Qing 1500Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 21081+22416 | Won21-13, 21-11 | 4% | 1571+70.8 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Ida Høyland W. 1703 / Henny Lyfjell 1714with Lee Zhi Qing 1500Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 21081+22416 | Won21-13, 21-11 | 4% | 1571+70.8 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Thea Johansen 1728 / Helene Abusdal 1830with Lee Zhi Qing 1571Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 19879+21042 | Won21-19, 21-9 | 4% | 1616+45.0 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Linn Lilian Stenrud 1778 / Marthe Skaug 1731with Lee Zhi Qing 1616Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43275 vs 19874+20093 | Won21-16, 21-17 | 11% | 1639+22.9 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Sonja Wåland 1844 / Marlene Wåland 1699with Lee Zhi Qing 1639Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 18758+20617 vs 43278+43275 | Lost10-21, 11-21 | 12% | 1631−7.8 |
Rating at the end of each week, November 2016 to November 2016
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | India | 1686 |
| 2017/2018 | India | 1661 |
| 2018/2019 | India | 1627 |
| 2019/2020 | India | 1608 |
| 2020/2021 | India | 1599 |
| 2021/2022 | India | 1582 |
| 2022/2023 | India | 1565 |
| 2023/2024 | India | 1551 |
| 2024/2025 | India | 1541 |
| 2025/2026 | India | 1532 |
| 2026/2027 | India | 1530 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Jim Ronny Andersen 1901 / Helene Abusdal 1883with Yogendran Krishnan 1838Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 19358+21042 | Won21-16, 21-15 | 10% | 1686+26.6 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Carl Christian Mork 1897 / Elisa Wiborg 1697with Yogendran Krishnan 1800Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 20589+20179 | Won21-11, 21-12 | 20% | 1659+51.0 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Emilie Faarup Storvik 1646 / Sturla Flåten Jørgensen 1799with Yogendran Krishnan 1759Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 21027+19566 | Won21-11, 21-10 | 26% | 1608+60.9 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Marlene Wåland 1746 / Rik Hermans 1496with Yogendran Krishnan 1740Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 20617+42966 | Won21-9, 21-17 | 53% | 1548+28.8 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Frida Kjellén 1500 / Bjørn Hamang 1473with Yogendran Krishnan 1728Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 43270+19829 | Won21-5, 21-7 | 88% | 1519+18.5 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2016 | Emilie Faarup Storvik 1646 / Sturla Flåten Jørgensen 1799with Yogendran Krishnan 1759Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 21027+19566 | Won21-11, 21-10 | 26% | 1608+60.9 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Carl Christian Mork 1897 / Elisa Wiborg 1697with Yogendran Krishnan 1800Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 20589+20179 | Won21-11, 21-12 | 20% | 1659+51.0 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Marlene Wåland 1746 / Rik Hermans 1496with Yogendran Krishnan 1740Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 20617+42966 | Won21-9, 21-17 | 53% | 1548+28.8 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Jim Ronny Andersen 1901 / Helene Abusdal 1883with Yogendran Krishnan 1838Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 19358+21042 | Won21-16, 21-15 | 10% | 1686+26.6 |
| 11 Nov 2016 | Frida Kjellén 1500 / Bjørn Hamang 1473with Yogendran Krishnan 1728Moss DNB Julecupen RT 15* + NRSenior (SEN E)T4837 43278+43272 vs 43270+19829 | Won21-5, 21-7 | 88% | 1519+18.5 |