Loading player…
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
- Mixed doubles (among men)
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles | Mixed doubles (among men) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017/2018 | #1572 of 1,760 | #1435 of 1,785 | – |
| 2018/2019 | #1659 of 1,841 | – | – |
| 2019/2020 | – | #1539 of 1,980 | #678 of 813 |
| 2020/2021 | – | #1379 of 1,779 | #605 of 718 |
| 2021/2022 | – | #1225 of 1,552 | #456 of 545 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Men's singles
- Rating
- 977 ±520
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1050
- Matches
- 4
- 0 won · 4 lost
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Mar 2018 | Ludvig Kolberg 1103Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 43402 vs 44725 | Lost4-21, 6-21 | 29% | 977−10.5 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Steinar Øyerhavn Berg 1028Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 44132 vs 44725 | Lost6-21, 7-21 | 48% | 988−30.3 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Ludvik Nilssen 990Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 43027 vs 44725 | Lost6-21, 4-21 | 59% | 1018−21.2 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Kenneth Bernhoff 950Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 42852 vs 44725 | Lost10-21, 14-21 | 68% | 1039−11.1 |
Highlights
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Mar 2018 | Steinar Øyerhavn Berg 1028Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 44132 vs 44725 | Lost6-21, 7-21 | 48% | 988−30.3 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Ludvik Nilssen 990Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 43027 vs 44725 | Lost6-21, 4-21 | 59% | 1018−21.2 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Kenneth Bernhoff 950Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 42852 vs 44725 | Lost10-21, 14-21 | 68% | 1039−11.1 |
| 2 Mar 2018 | Ludvig Kolberg 1103Grong Namdal Open (U9 A)T6028 43402 vs 44725 | Lost4-21, 6-21 | 29% | 977−10.5 |
Men's doubles
- Rating
- 1200 ±260
- Rank
- Not ranked