Loading player…
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | #1236 of 1,968 | #1141 of 1,980 |
| 2020/2021 | #1140 of 1,801 | #1028 of 1,779 |
| 2021/2022 | #1095 of 1,790 | #1058 of 1,853 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1113 ±520
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1125
- Matches
- 2
- 0 won · 2 lost
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2019 | Je Mark Ocaya 1133Klubbserie 2019/20 Pulje 1 (2. HS)L7884 45977 vs 45251 | Lost14-21, 16-21 | 47% | 1113−6.2 |
| 14 Oct 2019 | Vivek Rajendran 1131Klubbserie 2019/20 Pulje 1 (3. HS)L7823 45261 vs 45977 | Lost15-21, 16-21 | 49% | 1119−5.8 |
Highlights
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2019 | Je Mark Ocaya 1133Klubbserie 2019/20 Pulje 1 (2. HS)L7884 45977 vs 45251 | Lost14-21, 16-21 | 47% | 1113−6.2 |
| 14 Oct 2019 | Vivek Rajendran 1131Klubbserie 2019/20 Pulje 1 (3. HS)L7823 45261 vs 45977 | Lost15-21, 16-21 | 49% | 1119−5.8 |
Men's doubles
- Rating
- 1269 ±260
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1272
- Matches
- 4
- 1 won · 3 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, October 2019 to December 2019