Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | 1094 | 1262 |
| 2020/2021 | 1094 | 1262 |
| 2021/2022 | 1094 | 1262 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | #1341 of 1,968 | #1199 of 1,980 |
| 2020/2021 | #1231 of 1,801 | #1073 of 1,779 |
| 2021/2022 | #1219 of 1,805 | #1083 of 1,823 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Rating at the end of each week, October 2019 to January 2020
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | OSI | 1094 |
| 2020/2021 | OSI | 1094 |
| 2021/2022 | OSI | 1094 |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Jan 2020 | Gaurav Dhawan 1147Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (4. HS)L7667 46009 vs 46046 | Lost11-21, 11-21 | 42% | 1094−10.3 |
| 27 Oct 2019 | Rishabh Mann 1422Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (4. HS)L7657 46009 vs 42884 | Lost3-21, 7-21 | 8% | 1104−3.9 |
| 26 Oct 2019 | Muhammad Raheel Nasir 1085Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (3. HS)L7652 45379 vs 46009 | Lost8-21, 11-21 | 58% | 1108−17.0 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2019 | Muhammad Raheel Nasir 1085Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (3. HS)L7652 45379 vs 46009 | Lost8-21, 11-21 | 58% | 1108−17.0 |
| 25 Jan 2020 | Gaurav Dhawan 1147Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (4. HS)L7667 46009 vs 46046 | Lost11-21, 11-21 | 42% | 1094−10.3 |
| 27 Oct 2019 | Rishabh Mann 1422Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (4. HS)L7657 46009 vs 42884 | Lost3-21, 7-21 | 8% | 1104−3.9 |
Rating at the end of each week, October 2019 to January 2020
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | OSI | 1262 |
| 2020/2021 | OSI | 1262 |
| 2021/2022 | OSI | 1262 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Jan 2020 | Bengt Jonsson 1402 / Gaurav Dhawan 1282with Sander Ingvaldsen 1179Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7667 45785+46009 vs 20106+46046 | Lost17-21, 11-21 | 14% | 1262−1.3 |
| 30 Nov 2019 | Sainyam Chandra 1272 / Vivek Rajendran 1273with Magnus Hermstad 1277Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7660 45258+45261 vs 46195+46009 | Won21-17, 21-12 | 49% | 1263+3.1 |
| 27 Oct 2019 | Stephen Moc 1287 / Rishabh Mann 1532with Ashwin Nambiaruveettil 1268Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7657 16993+46009 vs 46079+42884 | Lost9-21, 14-21 | 10% | 1260−1.1 |
| 26 Oct 2019 | Muhammad Raheel Nasir 1260 / Rajiv Arora 1305with Magne Rolf Lyshol Gunnarson 1269Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7652 45379+43772 vs 45944+46009 | Lost13-21, 14-21 | 44% | 1261−3.8 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Nov 2019 | Sainyam Chandra 1272 / Vivek Rajendran 1273with Magnus Hermstad 1277Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7660 45258+45261 vs 46195+46009 | Won21-17, 21-12 | 49% | 1263+3.1 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2019 | Muhammad Raheel Nasir 1260 / Rajiv Arora 1305with Magne Rolf Lyshol Gunnarson 1269Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7652 45379+43772 vs 45944+46009 | Lost13-21, 14-21 | 44% | 1261−3.8 |
| 25 Jan 2020 | Bengt Jonsson 1402 / Gaurav Dhawan 1282with Sander Ingvaldsen 1179Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7667 45785+46009 vs 20106+46046 | Lost17-21, 11-21 | 14% | 1262−1.3 |
| 27 Oct 2019 | Stephen Moc 1287 / Rishabh Mann 1532with Ashwin Nambiaruveettil 1268Oslofjordserien 19/20 Pulje 1 (2. HD)L7657 16993+46009 vs 46079+42884 | Lost9-21, 14-21 | 10% | 1260−1.1 |