Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
| Season | Women's singles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | 1092 | 1022 | – |
| 2020/2021 | 1039 | 1056 | 1213 |
| 2021/2022 | 981 | 1052 | 1237 |
| 2022/2023 | 981 | 1052 | 1237 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Women's singles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles (among women) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | #449 of 703 | #674 of 687 | – |
Rating at the end of each week, February 2020 to November 2021
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | Båtsfjord | 1092 |
| 2020/2021 | Båtsfjord | 1039 |
| 2021/2022 | Båtsfjord | 981 |
| 2022/2023 | Båtsfjord | 981 |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2021 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1262Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 24436 vs 46468 | Lost10-21, 11-21 | 14% | 981−48.7 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Charlotte Mikalsen 720Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 46468 vs 29953 | Won17-21, 21-14, 21-16 | 91% | 1031+6.5 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Amanda Miller 1425Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 46525 vs 46468 | Lost17-21, 21-19, 23-25 | 4% | 1024−1.4 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 929Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45579 vs 46468 | Lost14-21, 21-12, 18-21 | 70% | 1025−14.2 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Sarah Slapø 1092Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 44849 vs 46468 | Lost10-21, 16-21 | 48% | 1039−39.7 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Mali Elise Eriksen 1440Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 29951 vs 46468 | Lost4-21, 7-21 | 7% | 1079−13.5 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Charlotte Mikalsen 737Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U15 A)T6247 46468 vs 29953 | Won13-21, 21-13, 21-19 | 94% | 1093+0.6 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 928Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U15 A)T6247 24436 vs 46468 | Lost9-21, 7-21 | 94% | 1092−183.3 |
| 2020/2021 | #475 of 636 | #605 of 629 | #474 of 611 |
| 2021/2022 | #513 of 586 | #560 of 578 | #387 of 546 |
| 2022/2023 | #558 of 635 | #621 of 635 | #408 of 575 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2021 | Charlotte Mikalsen 720Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 46468 vs 29953 | Won17-21, 21-14, 21-16 | 91% | 1031+6.5 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Charlotte Mikalsen 737Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U15 A)T6247 46468 vs 29953 | Won13-21, 21-13, 21-19 | 94% | 1093+0.6 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Feb 2020 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 928Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U15 A)T6247 24436 vs 46468 | Lost9-21, 7-21 | 94% | 1092−183.3 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1262Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 24436 vs 46468 | Lost10-21, 11-21 | 14% | 981−48.7 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Sarah Slapø 1092Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 44849 vs 46468 | Lost10-21, 16-21 | 48% | 1039−39.7 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 929Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45579 vs 46468 | Lost14-21, 21-12, 18-21 | 70% | 1025−14.2 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Mali Elise Eriksen 1440Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 29951 vs 46468 | Lost4-21, 7-21 | 7% | 1079−13.5 |
Rating at the end of each week, February 2020 to November 2021
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2019/2020 | Båtsfjord | 1022 |
| 2020/2021 | Båtsfjord | 1056 |
| 2021/2022 | Båtsfjord | 1052 |
| 2022/2023 | Båtsfjord | 1052 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2021 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 1278 / Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1375with Amanda Miller 1195Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45579+24436 vs 46525+46468 | Lost11-21, 16-21 | 4% | 1052−4.4 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Ane Nylund 1411 / Charlotte Mikalsen 1134with Johanne Mikkelhaug 1277Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46468+45579 vs 46526+29953 | Won21-19, 21-8 | 13% | 1056+33.8 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 1175 / Charlotte Mikalsen 1028with Mira Stensvik Eliassen 1070Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U17 A)T6247 45579+29953 vs 46468+38643 | Lost1-21, 1-21 | 49% | 1022−106.2 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1231 / Sarah Slapø 1156with Mira Stensvik Eliassen 1194Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U17 A)T6247 24436+44849 vs 46468+38643 | Lost1-21, 1-21 | 62% | 1128−126.9 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2020 | Ane Nylund 1411 / Charlotte Mikalsen 1134with Johanne Mikkelhaug 1277Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46468+45579 vs 46526+29953 | Won21-19, 21-8 | 13% | 1056+33.8 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Feb 2020 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1231 / Sarah Slapø 1156with Mira Stensvik Eliassen 1194Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U17 A)T6247 24436+44849 vs 46468+38643 | Lost1-21, 1-21 | 62% | 1128−126.9 |
| 29 Feb 2020 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 1175 / Charlotte Mikalsen 1028with Mira Stensvik Eliassen 1070Tana Vintergnisten 2020 (U17 A)T6247 45579+29953 vs 46468+38643 | Lost1-21, 1-21 | 49% | 1022−106.2 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Johanne Mikkelhaug 1278 / Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1375with Amanda Miller 1195Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45579+24436 vs 46525+46468 | Lost11-21, 16-21 | 4% | 1052−4.4 |
Rating at the end of each week, November 2020 to November 2021
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2020/2021 | Båtsfjord | 1213 |
| 2021/2022 | Båtsfjord | 1237 |
| 2022/2023 | Båtsfjord | 1237 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2021 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1190 / omar alhmo alhso 1363with Jetheekan jeyawardana 1250Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 24436+44228 vs 45469+46468 | Lost21-15, 19-21, 20-22 | 38% | 1237−4.1 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Amund Arvid Benberg Nordli 1316 / Charlotte Mikalsen 960with Jetheekan jeyawardana 1229Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45469+46468 vs 44607+29953 | Won21-11, 19-21, 21-6 | 78% | 1241+28.1 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Adrian Leander Hojem Steen 1246 / Ane Nylund 1411with Morten Jørgensen 1435Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46468+46320 vs 45073+46526 | Won21-15, 15-21, 21-19 | 48% | 1213+1.8 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Sami Manfreda 1317 / Johanne Mikkelhaug 1166with Morten Jørgensen 1445Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46641+45579 vs 46468+46320 | Lost17-21, 18-21 | 81% | 1211−12.4 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2021 | Amund Arvid Benberg Nordli 1316 / Charlotte Mikalsen 960with Jetheekan jeyawardana 1229Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 45469+46468 vs 44607+29953 | Won21-11, 19-21, 21-6 | 78% | 1241+28.1 |
| 7 Nov 2020 | Adrian Leander Hojem Steen 1246 / Ane Nylund 1411with Morten Jørgensen 1435Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46468+46320 vs 45073+46526 | Won21-15, 15-21, 21-19 | 48% | 1213+1.8 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2020 | Sami Manfreda 1317 / Johanne Mikkelhaug 1166with Morten Jørgensen 1445Kirkenes Barents Open 2020 (U17 A)T6377 46641+45579 vs 46468+46320 | Lost17-21, 18-21 | 81% | 1211−12.4 |
| 6 Nov 2021 | Karoline Strandheim Eriksen 1190 / omar alhmo alhso 1363with Jetheekan jeyawardana 1250Kirkenes Barents Open 2021 (U19 A)T6497 24436+44228 vs 45469+46468 | Lost21-15, 19-21, 20-22 | 38% | 1237−4.1 |