Loading player…
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Women's singles | Women's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2021/2022 | #254 of 586 | #527 of 578 |
| 2022/2023 | #292 of 708 | #629 of 686 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2022 | Gülser Selin Kilinc 1373Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46929 vs 47351 | Lost4-21, 4-21 | 35% | 1234−61.0 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Nadia Yaqub 1275Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 47351 vs 47297 | Won21-17, 21-15 | 50% | 1295+19.7 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2022 | Nadia Yaqub 1275Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 47351 vs 47297 | Won21-17, 21-15 | 50% | 1295+19.7 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2022 | Gülser Selin Kilinc 1373Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46929 vs 47351 | Lost4-21, 4-21 | 35% | 1234−61.0 |
Rating at the end of each week, March 2022 to March 2022
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2021/2022 | Mortensrud-Aker | 1117 |
| 2022/2023 | Mortensrud-Aker | 1117 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2022 | Shilpa Danve 1356 / Tonje Jacobsen 1359with Mari Birkelund 1198Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46989+47716 vs 46927+47351 | Lost19-21, 16-21 | 5% | 1117−0.7 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Malin Eriksrud Solbakken 1267 / Frida Hammer 1267with Mari Birkelund 1171Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46927+47351 vs 47079+47371 | Won21-13, 21-14 | 11% | 1117+33.4 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Gladys Jude Lourderajan 1197 / Sasiga Logeswaran 1291with Mari Birkelund 1179Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46337+46532 vs 46927+47351 | Lost14-21, 6-21 | 16% | 1084−9.9 |
| 5 Mar 2022 | Marie A. Toverud 1045 / Helene A. Toverud 1213with Palwasha Sahag 1194Vestre Aker Fjærfest (SEN D)T6553 39691+39690 vs 47351+46812 | Lost10-21, 6-21 | 73% | 1094−99.9 |
| 5 Mar 2022 | Linnea Cecilie Sørlie 1002 / Stine Holm Bjørdal 1166with Palwasha Sahag 1275Vestre Aker Fjærfest (SEN D)T6553 18440+46529 vs 47351+46812 | Lost5-21, 6-21 | 95% | 1194−81.0 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Mar 2022 | Malin Eriksrud Solbakken 1267 / Frida Hammer 1267with Mari Birkelund 1171Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46927+47351 vs 47079+47371 | Won21-13, 21-14 | 11% | 1117+33.4 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Mar 2022 | Marie A. Toverud 1045 / Helene A. Toverud 1213with Palwasha Sahag 1194Vestre Aker Fjærfest (SEN D)T6553 39691+39690 vs 47351+46812 | Lost10-21, 6-21 | 73% | 1094−99.9 |
| 5 Mar 2022 | Linnea Cecilie Sørlie 1002 / Stine Holm Bjørdal 1166with Palwasha Sahag 1275Vestre Aker Fjærfest (SEN D)T6553 18440+46529 vs 47351+46812 | Lost5-21, 6-21 | 95% | 1194−81.0 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Gladys Jude Lourderajan 1197 / Sasiga Logeswaran 1291with Mari Birkelund 1179Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46337+46532 vs 46927+47351 | Lost14-21, 6-21 | 16% | 1084−9.9 |
| 12 Mar 2022 | Shilpa Danve 1356 / Tonje Jacobsen 1359with Mari Birkelund 1198Lambertseter IF OSI / Lambertseter Oslo Vår Smash (SEN D)T6511 46989+47716 vs 46927+47351 | Lost19-21, 16-21 | 5% | 1117−0.7 |