Loading player…
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
- Mixed doubles (among men)
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles | Mixed doubles (among men) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021/2022 | #358 of 1,629 | #348 of 1,691 | #173 of 636 |
| 2022/2023 | #421 of 1,937 | #378 of 2,033 | #177 of 811 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1419 ±520
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1425
- Matches
- 2
- 0 won · 2 lost
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar 2022 | Gintar Rundelis 2003Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 22670 vs 47584 | Lost18-21, 0-21 | 1% | 1419−4.9 |
| 11 Mar 2022 | Pål Endre Pedersen 2038Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 23298 vs 47584 | Lost23-21, 15-21, 16-21 | 1% | 1424−0.7 |
Highlights
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar 2022 | Gintar Rundelis 2003Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 22670 vs 47584 | Lost18-21, 0-21 | 1% | 1419−4.9 |
| 11 Mar 2022 | Pål Endre Pedersen 2038Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 23298 vs 47584 | Lost23-21, 15-21, 16-21 | 1% | 1424−0.7 |
Men's doubles
- Rating
- 1446 ±260
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1452
- Matches
- 2
- 0 won · 2 lost
Matches
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Mar 2022 | Ole Salomonsen 1725 / Gintar Rundelis 1569with Markus Haukebøe 1419Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 22644+22670 vs 47584+21182 | Lost14-21, 17-21 | 4% | 1446−3.3 |
| 11 Mar 2022 | Pål Endre Pedersen 1823 / Håkon Haukebøe 1522with Markus Haukebøe 1421Tromsø Veteranmesterskapet (O35 A)T6463 23298+19450 vs 47584+21182 | Lost6-21, 15-21 | 3% | 1449−2.6 |