Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rating by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2024/2025 | 1065 | 1253 |
| 2025/2026 | 1065 | 1279 |
| 2026/2027 | – | 1279 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
Rank by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2024/2025 | #1400 of 1,953 | #1303 of 2,052 |
| 2025/2026 | #1434 of 2,041 | #1164 of 2,021 |
| 2026/2027 | – | #1183 of 2,058 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1065 ±328
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1275
- Matches
- 5
- 0 won · 5 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, February 2025 to March 2025
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2024/2025 | OSI | 1065 |
| 2025/2026 | OSI | 1065 |
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Mar 2025 | Minh Hoang 1159Stovner STOVNER SMASH (SEN D)T6897 49878 vs 50693 | Lost7-21, 9-21 | 44% | 1065−61.6 |
| 22 Mar 2025 | Sathyanarayanan Kannan 1040Stovner STOVNER SMASH (SEN D)T6897 50617 vs 50693 | Lost21-13, 16-21, 22-24 | 67% | 1127−4.2 |
| 22 Mar 2025 | Luxshan Manoranjan 1347Stovner STOVNER SMASH (SEN D)T6897 47725 vs 50693 | Lost15-21, 12-21 | 17% | 1131−11.6 |
| 15 Feb 2025 | Patryk Daniel Kilianski 904OSI OSI: Våryr (SEN D)T6913 50019 vs 50693 | Lost24-26, 7-21 | 91% | 1142−56.6 |
| 15 Feb 2025 | Tamilan jeevakumar 1172OSI OSI: Våryr (SEN D)T6913 49047 vs 50693 | Lost11-21, 8-21 | 69% | 1199−75.6 |