Loading player…
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles |
|---|---|---|
| 2025/2026 | – | #1244 of 2,021 |
| 2026/2027 | #1040 of 1,950 | #1346 of 2,058 |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Endre Ramsdal 1170BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51645 vs 51922 | Lost6-15, 15-10, 9-15 | 53% | 1163−23.2 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Benjamin Chen-Nilsen 1082BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 46864 vs 51922 | Lost8-15, 3-15 | 84% | 1187−111.5 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Leonard Eide 1133BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922 vs 52227 | Won15-11, 15-5 | 75% | 1297+22.3 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Samuel Gravdal 888BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922 vs 47894 | Won9-15, 15-12, 18-16 | 95% | 1275+0.3 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Leonard Eide 1133BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922 vs 52227 | Won15-11, 15-5 | 75% | 1297+22.3 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Samuel Gravdal 888BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922 vs 47894 | Won9-15, 15-12, 18-16 | 95% | 1275+0.3 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Benjamin Chen-Nilsen 1082BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 46864 vs 51922 | Lost8-15, 3-15 | 84% | 1187−111.5 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Endre Ramsdal 1170BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51645 vs 51922 | Lost6-15, 15-10, 9-15 | 53% | 1163−23.2 |
Rating at the end of each week, May 2026 to September 2026
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2025/2026 | Varegg Allianse-Idrettslag | 1263 |
| 2026/2027 | Varegg Allianse-Idrettslag | 1247 |
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Erland Foshaug 1113 / Nils Mikkelsen-Guerreiro 1166with Fredrik Norberg 1340BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922+51919 vs 48529+50424 | Won15-9, 16-14 | 91% | 1248+1.7 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Yihang Shang 1214 / Benjamin Chen-Nilsen 1194with Fredrik Norberg 1375BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 46858+46864 vs 51922+51919 | Lost7-15, 10-15 | 87% | 1245−31.6 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Musawar Qadir 1275 / Nicolas Bæverfjord 1275with Fredrik Norberg 1358BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922+51919 vs 52207+52208 | Won15-7, 15-9 | 63% | 1278+14.7 |
| 9 May 2026 | Maxence Prouteau 1275 / Elias Eichner 1099with Kim Christiansen 1340Askøy Askøyserven (SEN D)T6984 51930+51922 vs 52033+46249 | Won25-23, 19-21, 21-18 | 85% | 1263+0.5 |
| 9 May 2026 | Hans Olav Femsteinevik 1312 / Kristoffer Eikeland 1299with Kim Christiansen 1352Askøy Askøyserven (SEN D)T6984 45109+48981 vs 51930+51922 | Lost15-21, 15-21 | 53% | 1262−12.9 |
The matches that raised the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Musawar Qadir 1275 / Nicolas Bæverfjord 1275with Fredrik Norberg 1358BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922+51919 vs 52207+52208 | Won15-7, 15-9 | 63% | 1278+14.7 |
| 26 Sep 2026 | Erland Foshaug 1113 / Nils Mikkelsen-Guerreiro 1166with Fredrik Norberg 1340BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 51922+51919 vs 48529+50424 | Won15-9, 16-14 | 91% | 1248+1.7 |
| 9 May 2026 | Maxence Prouteau 1275 / Elias Eichner 1099with Kim Christiansen 1340Askøy Askøyserven (SEN D)T6984 51930+51922 vs 52033+46249 | Won25-23, 19-21, 21-18 | 85% | 1263+0.5 |
The matches that lowered the rating most
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26 Sep 2026 | Yihang Shang 1214 / Benjamin Chen-Nilsen 1194with Fredrik Norberg 1375BSI BSI-Smashen 2026 (SEN D)T7115 46858+46864 vs 51922+51919 | Lost7-15, 10-15 | 87% | 1245−31.6 |
| 9 May 2026 | Hans Olav Femsteinevik 1312 / Kristoffer Eikeland 1299with Kim Christiansen 1352Askøy Askøyserven (SEN D)T6984 45109+48981 vs 51930+51922 | Lost15-21, 15-21 | 53% | 1262−12.9 |