Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Tiantian Zhu | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 1 | 8 |
| Points won | 13141.7% | 18358.3% |
| Average winning margin | – | 13.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-8, 21-8+26 points · 4 Jan 2025 · women's singles |
1 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer won 21-18, 15-21, 21-15 (by 3 points) on 24 May 2025.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Tiantian Zhu's chance of winning against Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Women's singles
- Tiantian Zhu
- 1245 ±238
- #370 · peak 1412
- Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer
- 1433 ±233
- #208 · peak 1512
19% Tiantian ZhuBetzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer 81%
Met 3 times in women's singles: Tiantian Zhu won 0, lost 3.
Winning margins in women's singles
| Measure | Tiantian Zhu | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 3 |
| Sets won | 1 | 6 |
| Points won | 99 |
Matches against each other
From Tiantian Zhu's side, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Nov 2025 | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer 1408Slagen Slagentreffen 2025 (SEN D)T7046 44663 vs 50108 | Lost −1317-21, 12-21 | 24% | 1245−13.0 |
| 24 May 2025 | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer 1414Sandefjord Sandefjord Open 2025 (SEN D)T6884 44663 vs 50108 | Lost −318-21, 21-15, 15-21 | 50% | 1405−6.7 |
| 24 May 2025 | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer 1354 / Hong-Thien Nguyen Phatak 1155with Silje Stenstad Nilsen 1249Sandefjord Sandefjord Open 2025 (SEN C)T6884 44663+45464 vs 46359+50108 | Lost −1016-21, 16-21 | 66% | 1330−15.1 |
| 4 Jan 2025 | Betzy Margrethe Parelius Wammer 1268Sandefjord Sandefjord senior (SEN D)T6933 44663 vs 50108 | Lost −268-21, 8-21 | 56% | 1154−143.0 |