Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
- Mixed doubles
Rating by season
| Season | Men's singles | Men's doubles | Mixed doubles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | 1327 | 1483 | – |
| 2015/2016 | 1186 | 1373 | 1327 |
| 2016/2017 | 1148 | 1408 | 1327 |
| 2017/2018 | 1092 | 1416 | 1327 |
| 2018/2019 | 1092 | 1416 | 1327 |
| 2019/2020 | 1280 | 1415 | 1288 |
| 2020/2021 | 1280 | 1415 | 1288 |
| 2021/2022 | 1280 | 1415 | 1288 |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Men's singles
- Men's doubles
- Mixed doubles (among men)
Men's singles
- Rating
- 1280 ±498
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1465
- Matches
- 34
- 13 won · 21 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, October 2014 to February 2020
- Trondheim
- NTNUI
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2014/2015 | Trondheim | 1327 |
| 2015/2016 | Trondheim | 1186 |
| 2016/2017 | Trondheim | 1148 |
| 2017/2018 | Trondheim | 1092 |
| 2018/2019 | Trondheim | 1092 |
| 2019/2020 | Trondheim | 1280 |
| 2020/2021 | Trondheim | 1280 |
| 2021/2022 | Trondheim | 1280 |
Matches
| Date | Opponent | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Feb 2020 | Thomas Haugen 1128Klæbu Smash Cup 2020 (SEN B)T6262 21107 vs 43604 | Won21-10, 21-11 | 64% | 1280+78.0 |
| 7 Feb 2020 | Runar Måøy 1635Klæbu Smash Cup 2020 (SEN B)T6262 19192 vs 21107 | Lost18-21, 16-21 | 4% | 1201−4.9 |
| 26 Jan 2020 | Bernt Erik Sandnes 13632. div Midt-Norge Pulje 1 (3. HS)L8132 44075 vs 21107 | Won21-16, 21-8 | 11% | 1207+114.6 |
| 1 Dec 2017 | Adrian Olsen-Loe Pedersen 1214Trondheim TBK Julecup 2017 (SEN B)T6032 26644 vs 21107 | Lost16-21, 18-21 | 37% | 1092−50.9 |
| 1 Dec 2017 | Ådne Strøm 1732Trondheim TBK Julecup 2017 (SEN B)T6032 23186 vs 21107 | Lost12-21, 11-21 | 1% | 1143−4.3 |
| 6 Oct 2017 | Ole Andreas Hansen 1853NTNUI NTNUI Treffpunkt (SEN A)T5995 18646 vs 21107 | Lost13-21, 17-21 | <1% | 1147−0.6 |
| 3 Mar 2017 | Oddbjørn Svinsås 1309NTNUI NTNUI Open 2017 (SEN B)T5895 24461 vs 21107 | Lost14-21, 21-16, 12-21 | 25% | 1148−17.0 |
| 3 Mar 2017 | Robert Barø 1582NTNUI NTNUI Open 2017 (SEN B)T5895 35305 vs 21107 | Lost10-21, 9-21 | 4% | 1165−10.4 |
| 7 Oct 2016 | Iver Aalberg 1565NTNUI NTNUI Treffpunkt 2016 (SEN B)T5894 22847 vs 21107 | Lost10-21, 14-21 | 5% | 1175−9.0 |
| 7 Oct 2016 | Clement Perisse 1425NTNUI NTNUI Treffpunkt 2016 (SEN B)T5894 43094 vs 21107 | Lost16-21, 21-8, 15-21 | 14% | 1184−1.8 |
| 3 Apr 2016 | Tor Stenvaag 14941.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3812 21107 vs 23608 | Lost17-21, 9-21 | 10% | 1186−14.4 |
| 3 Apr 2016 | Glenn Fylling 11211.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3811 21107 vs 21996 | Won21-17, 21-17 | 60% | 1201+27.7 |
| 3 Apr 2016 | Robert Sulebakk 18261.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3810 21107 vs 23782 | Lost12-21, 11-21 | 1% | 1173−1.3 |
| 4 Mar 2016 | Oddbjørn Svinsås 1557NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN B)T761 24461 vs 21107 | Lost12-21, 19-21 | 5% | 1174−5.1 |
| 4 Mar 2016 | Ruben Edna 1393NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN B)T761 21107 vs 31170 | Won21-18, 22-20 | 13% | 1179+35.6 |
| 24 Jan 2016 | Trond Mære 17301.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3797 21107 vs 21308 | Lost7-21, 17-21 | 1% | 1144−4.1 |
| 24 Jan 2016 | Guangcheng Hua 13611.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3796 36505 vs 21107 | Won16-21, 21-18, 21-19 | 15% | 1147+11.2 |
| 23 Jan 2016 | Robin Kruksve Krux 15211.div Pulje 1 (2. HS)L3789 21107 vs 23292 | Lost24-22, 10-21, 15-21 | 5% | 1137−4.5 |
| 28 Nov 2015 | Torbjørn Nilsen 1425Trondheim TBK Julecup 2015 (SEN B)T2793 42746 vs 21107 | Lost16-21, 18-21 | 11% | 1140−15.6 |
| 28 Nov 2015 | Jørgen Rørstad 1425Trondheim TBK Julecup 2015 (SEN B)T2793 19379 vs 21107 | Lost11-21, 8-21 | 22% | 1157−104.1 |