Torbjørn Nilsen

Compare head to head with another player →

Rating history

Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.

Men's singles
Men's doubles

Rating by season

Season	Men's singles	Men's doubles
2015/2016	1524	1482
2016/2017	1522	1482
2017/2018	1518	1482
2018/2019	1514	1482
2019/2020	1512	1482
2020/2021	1511	1482
2021/2022	1511	1490
2022/2023	1511	1490
2023/2024	1508	–
2024/2025	1507	–
2025/2026	1505	–
2026/2027	1505	–

Ranking history

National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.

Men's singles
Men's doubles

Men's singles

Rating: 1505 ±520
Rank: Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
Peak: 1634
Matches: 7; 4 won · 3 lost

Rating history

Rating at the end of each week, November 2015 to May 2022

Berlevåg
Trondheim

Rating by season

Season	Club	Rating at end
2015/2016	Berlevåg	1524
2016/2017	Berlevåg	1522
2017/2018	Berlevåg	1518
2018/2019	Berlevåg	1514
2019/2020	Berlevåg	1512
2020/2021	Berlevåg	1511
2021/2022	Trondheim	1511
2022/2023	Trondheim	1511
2023/2024	Trondheim	1508
2024/2025	Trondheim

Loading player…

Men's doubles

Season	Men's singles	Men's doubles
2015/2016	#264 of 1,621	#297 of 1,589
2016/2017	–	–
2017/2018	–	–
2018/2019	–	–
2019/2020	–	–
2020/2021	–	–
2021/2022	#272 of 1,629	#258 of 1,691
2022/2023	–	#285 of 2,020
2023/2024	–	–
2024/2025	–	–
2025/2026	–	–
2026/2027	–	–

Date	Opponent	Result	Win chance	Rating
21 May 2022	Kristian Møkkelgård 10142. div Midt-Norge Pulje 1 (3. HS)`L9452 42746 vs 23717`	Won21-12, 21-13	98%	1511+1.8
4 Mar 2016	Åsmund Oma 1779NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 19152 vs 42746`	Lost14-21, 7-21	18%	1524−54.2
4 Mar 2016	Beda Büchel 1618NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 26719 vs 42746`	Lost23-25, 17-21	48%	1578−29.1
26 Feb 2016	Vemund Wennemo 1518Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 22124 vs 42746`	Lost21-7, 22-24, 15-21	71%	1607−27.1
26 Feb 2016	Tore Hansen 1598Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 42746 vs 24065`	Won21-17, 21-9	26%	1634+170.2
26 Feb 2016	Lars Erik Karlsen 1368Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 42746 vs 20897`	Won21-16, 19-21, 21-16	63%	1464+26.6
28 Nov 2015	Thomas Agung D. A. Thrane 1156Trondheim TBK Julecup 2015 (SEN B)`T2793 42746 vs 21107`	Won21-16, 21-18	89%	1437+12.4

Date	Opponent	Result	Win chance	Rating
26 Feb 2016	Tore Hansen 1598Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 42746 vs 24065`	Won21-17, 21-9	26%	1634+170.2
26 Feb 2016	Lars Erik Karlsen 1368Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 42746 vs 20897`	Won21-16, 19-21, 21-16	63%	1464+26.6
28 Nov 2015	Thomas Agung D. A. Thrane 1156Trondheim TBK Julecup 2015 (SEN B)`T2793 42746 vs 21107`	Won21-16, 21-18	89%	1437+12.4
21 May 2022	Kristian Møkkelgård 10142. div Midt-Norge Pulje 1 (3. HS)`L9452 42746 vs 23717`	Won21-12, 21-13	98%	1511+1.8

Date	Opponent	Result	Win chance	Rating
4 Mar 2016	Åsmund Oma 1779NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 19152 vs 42746`	Lost14-21, 7-21	18%	1524−54.2
4 Mar 2016	Beda Büchel 1618NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 26719 vs 42746`	Lost23-25, 17-21	48%	1578−29.1
26 Feb 2016	Vemund Wennemo 1518Grong Namdal Open (SEN B)`T2812 22124 vs 42746`	Lost21-7, 22-24, 15-21	71%	1607−27.1

Rating

1490 ±260

Rank

Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months

Peak

1490

Matches

3 won · 3 lost

Rating history

Rating at the end of each week, February 2016 to May 2022

Berlevåg
Trondheim

Rating by season

Season	Club	Rating at end
2015/2016	Berlevåg	1482
2016/2017	Berlevåg	1482
2017/2018	Berlevåg	1482
2018/2019	Berlevåg	1482
2019/2020	Berlevåg	1482
2020/2021	Berlevåg	1482
2021/2022	Trondheim	1490
2022/2023	Trondheim	1490

Matches

Date	Opponents	Result	Win chance	Rating
21 May 2022	Kristian Møkkelgård 1447 / Joakim Øyen Bedsted 1486with Jonas Midtøy 15412. div Midt-Norge Pulje 1 (2. HD)`L9452 29857+42746 vs 23717+44025`	Won17-21, 21-14, 21-14	67%	1490+8.1
4 Mar 2016	Rune Oterhals 1588 / Petter Svendsen 1744with Åsmund Oma 1756NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 18661+18830 vs 42746+19152`	Lost11-21, 21-11, 17-21	34%	1482−4.8
4 Mar 2016	Amund Skavhaug 1597 / Robert Barø 1598with Åsmund Oma 1754NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 42746+19152 vs 23373+35305`	Won16-21, 21-16, 21-16	58%	1486+7.3
26 Feb 2016	Xiaodong Chen 1673 / Håkon Skogland Halvorsen 1336with Egil Johansen 1604Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 26718+20855 vs 19378+42746`	Lost21-15, 20-22, 19-21	65%	1479−4.8
26 Feb 2016	Ådne Strøm 1601 / Kristoffer Brandsås Berg 1276with Egil Johansen 1593Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 19378+42746 vs 23186+25180`	Won21-12, 21-17	79%	1484+31.8
26 Feb 2016	Fredrik Lian 1576 / Robin Kruksve Krux 1563with Egil Johansen 1596Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 20987+23292 vs 19378+42746`	Lost18-21, 21-19, 14-21	35%	1452−10.1

Highlights

The matches that raised the rating most

Date	Opponents	Result	Win chance	Rating
26 Feb 2016	Ådne Strøm 1601 / Kristoffer Brandsås Berg 1276with Egil Johansen 1593Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 19378+42746 vs 23186+25180`	Won21-12, 21-17	79%	1484+31.8
21 May 2022	Kristian Møkkelgård 1447 / Joakim Øyen Bedsted 1486with Jonas Midtøy 15412. div Midt-Norge Pulje 1 (2. HD)`L9452 29857+42746 vs 23717+44025`	Won17-21, 21-14, 21-14	67%	1490+8.1
4 Mar 2016	Amund Skavhaug 1597 / Robert Barø 1598with Åsmund Oma 1754NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 42746+19152 vs 23373+35305`	Won16-21, 21-16, 21-16	58%	1486+7.3

The matches that lowered the rating most

Date	Opponents	Result	Win chance	Rating
26 Feb 2016	Fredrik Lian 1576 / Robin Kruksve Krux 1563with Egil Johansen 1596Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 20987+23292 vs 19378+42746`	Lost18-21, 21-19, 14-21	35%	1452−10.1
4 Mar 2016	Rune Oterhals 1588 / Petter Svendsen 1744with Åsmund Oma 1756NTNUI NTNUI Open 2016 (SEN A)`T761 18661+18830 vs 42746+19152`	Lost11-21, 21-11, 17-21	34%	1482−4.8
26 Feb 2016	Xiaodong Chen 1673 / Håkon Skogland Halvorsen 1336with Egil Johansen 1604Grong Namdal Open (SEN A)`T2812 26718+20855 vs 19378+42746`	Lost21-15, 20-22, 19-21	65%	1479−4.8