Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Women's singles
- Women's doubles
- Mixed doubles
- Men's singles
Rating by season
| Season | Women's singles | Women's doubles | Mixed doubles | Men's singles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017/2018 | 1047 | – | – | 1019 |
| 2018/2019 | 1045 | – | – | 1032 |
| 2019/2020 | 1092 | 1221 | 1230 | 1032 |
| 2020/2021 | 1092 | 1221 | 1230 | 1032 |
| 2021/2022 | 1092 | 1221 | 1230 | – |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Women's singles
- Women's doubles
- Mixed doubles (among women)
- Men's singles
Women's singles
- Rating
- 1092 ±446
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1127
- Matches
- 31
- 13 won · 18 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, November 2017 to February 2020
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2017/2018 | Asker | 1047 |
| 2018/2019 | Asker | 1045 |
| 2019/2020 | Asker | 1092 |
| 2020/2021 | Asker | 1092 |
| 2021/2022 | Asker | 1092 |
Biggest rival
The opponent with the closest matches, from at least 3 meetings
3 matches: 3 won, 0 lost · average margin 13.4% of points · last met 30 Nov 2019 · head to head
Also close: