Loading player…
Rating history
Rating in each discipline at the end of each week. Doubles ratings spread over a narrower range than singles, so compare how each line moves rather than the levels between singles and doubles.
- Women's singles
- Men's singles
Rating by season
| Season | Women's singles | Men's singles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | – | 1040 |
| 2017/2018 | 962 | 992 |
| 2018/2019 | 962 | 992 |
| 2019/2020 | 962 | – |
Rating at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Ranking history
National rank at the end of each week, among players who had played in the last 12 months; mixed doubles ranks men and women separately. Gaps are periods without a rank. The scale is logarithmic, so moving from #100 to #50 looks as big as from #20 to #10.
- Women's singles
- Men's singles
Rank by season
| Season | Women's singles | Men's singles |
|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | – | #1405 of 1,742 |
| 2017/2018 | #644 of 737 | #1537 of 1,760 |
| 2018/2019 | #567 of 668 | #1586 of 1,811 |
| 2019/2020 | #584 of 687 | – |
Rank at the end of each season (or the latest week for the current one).
Women's singles
- Rating
- 962 ±492
- Rank
- Not ranked No matches in the last 12 months
- Peak
- 1070
- Matches
- 20
- 9 won · 11 lost
Rating history
Rating at the end of each week, October 2017 to February 2019
Rating by season
| Season | Club | Rating at end |
|---|---|---|
| 2017/2018 | Asker | 962 |
| 2018/2019 | Asker | 962 |
| 2019/2020 | Asker | 962 |
Biggest rival
The opponent with the closest matches, from at least 3 meetings
3 matches: 3 won, 0 lost · average margin 14.8% of points · last met 3 Mar 2018 · head to head
Also close:
- Victoria Heiberg 3 matches, 0–3, margin 38.0% · head to head