Loading…
← Rankings
Head to head
Two players' matches against each other and together, and their chances if they met now.
Winning margins
Over their 4 matches against each other with a score (not walkovers), all disciplines.
| Measure | Vegard Langseth-Johnsen | Platon Lazukin |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 4 |
| Sets won | 3 | 8 |
| Points won | 19547.1% | 21952.9% |
| Average winning margin | – | 6.0 points |
| Biggest win | – | 21-11, 21-16+15 points · 25 Apr 2026 · men's doubles |
3 of 4 matches went to a deciding set. Closest: Platon Lazukin won 21-18, 18-21, 21-19 (by 2 points) on 9 May 2026.
If they met now
Current ratings in each discipline both play, and Vegard Langseth-Johnsen's chance of winning against Platon Lazukin. In doubles, the chance is with equally rated partners: a pair's rating is the sum of its players'.
Men's singles
- Vegard Langseth-Johnsen
- 957 ±206
- #1759 · peak 1152
- Platon Lazukin
- 1101 ±180
- #1232 · peak 1103
25% Vegard Langseth-JohnsenPlaton Lazukin 75%
Met 1 time in men's singles: Vegard Langseth-Johnsen won 0, lost 1.
Winning margins in men's singles
| Measure | Vegard Langseth-Johnsen | Platon Lazukin |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0 | 1 |
| Sets won | 1 | 2 |
| Points won | 5447.8% |
Matches against each other
From Vegard Langseth-Johnsen's side, newest first
| Date | Opponents | Result | Win chance | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 May 2026 | Dorian Gromyko 1050 / Platon Lazukin 1215with Kristian Nyland Aambø 1210Haugerud Haugerud vårcup (U17 B)T6999 48794+49158 vs 47269+47818 | Lost −218-21, 21-18, 19-21 | 40% | 1001−0.9 |
| 25 Apr 2026 | Platon Lazukin 1205 / Dorian Gromyko 1038with Kristian Nyland Aambø 1234Bygdø Bygdø Vårtreff 2026 (U17 B)T6991 49158+48794 vs 47818+47269 | Lost −1511-21, 16-21 | 52% | 1005−12.9 |
| 6 Dec 2025 | Platon Lazukin 1013Haugerud Haugerud cup (U17 B)T6998 49158 vs 47269 | Lost −516-21, 21-17, 17-21 | 33% | 919−4.5 |
| 24 May 2025 | Jonathan Hagberg Nor 1190 / Platon Lazukin 1207with Lasse Dähnn 1143Haugerud Haugerud vårcup (U17 C)T6872 50126+49158 vs 47269+47273 | Lost −218-21, 21-16, 17-21 | 16% | 1033−0.1 |